Two polar opposites stylistically. The short, stocky, two handed boxer-puncher in Perez, or the tall, lanky outboxer in Chitalada?
I like Pasqual to put too much pressure on Chitalada. Scoring on the inside & avoiding the lanky arms of Sot. Pasqual by UD.
I'm gonna pick Sot. I seem to disagree with everyone in these threads anyway!! Sot wasn't just lanky, he was massive...Perez might not like being inside as much you boys think. Sot toughts it out to a decision, a tough one all-be-it.
Well of course i haven't seen Pascual Perez on film, but i have him as one of the greatest flyweights ever regardless. Apparently he was a two fisted attacking fighter, one must think this would be a very difficult proposition for him, i'm going with McGrain, seen as though i've actually seen Chitalada.
Apart from Wilde and Lynch , I would hesitate to pick any fly over Perez,and ,good as Chitalada was, Perez beats him in an all action scrap, tunnelling his way inside to score heavily.
I think Chitalda can hang better in the inside than Perez can hang on the outside so i pick Chitalada by a 15 round upset