All time rank of Fury?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Mighty, Oct 10, 2021.


.

  1. Top 10

    31 vote(s)
    35.2%
  2. Top 15

    14 vote(s)
    15.9%
  3. Top 20

    19 vote(s)
    21.6%
  4. Top 20+

    24 vote(s)
    27.3%
  1. Ted Stickles

    Ted Stickles Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,244
    2,185
    Jun 24, 2007
    If he beats, Whyte, Ruiz, Usyk and maybe Aj because if AJ loses again he’s all but done. He would be the best of his era and top 10-15 atg
     
    OvidsExile likes this.
  2. timeout

    timeout Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,718
    3,533
    Jun 15, 2010
    Yeah well boxrec DKSAB

    Lemmux is classed as 1 and Povetkin is classed as no 15:duh Valuev 22 lol
     
    catchwtboxing likes this.
  3. Safin

    Safin Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    5,764
    7,723
    Aug 3, 2019
    Imagine if Fury went on a reign beating legends like Mormeck, Leapai, Brock, Molina, Breazeale, Takam, Martin, Pulev and co.? He would surely be considered one of the greatest of all time, according to this forum's criteria for greatness.
     
  4. ForemanJab

    ForemanJab Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,063
    12,358
    May 8, 2014
  5. Pugilist_Spec

    Pugilist_Spec Hands Of Stone Full Member

    4,937
    787
    Aug 17, 2015
    H2H I don't know.

    Resume wise you can't rate him top 10 no way. I'd even say top 15 is a push.

    He beat 2 guys that you could say are top 5 fighters. Maybe you can give Chisora a fringe top 10 rating. That's it.
    Wlad was an ATG win and the jury is still out on Wilder. if Wilder retires right now he's basically a guy who beat a ton of C level fighters and Ortiz. Which makes Furys wins over him, not that great.
     
    Last edited: Oct 10, 2021
    Greg Price99, OvidsExile and kirk like this.
  6. jmb1356

    jmb1356 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,837
    1,937
    Sep 30, 2019
    Still being determined, but he'll probably be top 30-50 easy.
     
  7. Banana-Rama

    Banana-Rama Active Member Full Member

    1,017
    1,344
    Nov 28, 2015
    H2H he is top 10, prime Fury is a problem for any HW in history.
     
  8. Rakesh

    Rakesh Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,652
    2,182
    Jul 6, 2021
    Same boat as Vitali currently, resume isn't good enough for a top 10 ranking.
     
    Greg Price99 and OvidsExile like this.
  9. kirk

    kirk l l l Staff Member

    71,160
    28,001
    Jul 26, 2004
    I find him so hard to rank because there's a huge (possibly one of the biggest ever) disparities between his level, and his resume.

    And while I likely have him top 3 in head to head fights... At the end of the day resume is what matters and he's got a horrible one when talking ATG discussions, imo.
     
    Greg Price99 likes this.
  10. Mickc

    Mickc Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,497
    2,670
    Nov 28, 2015
    If Joshua loses the rematch to Usyk then he’s irrelevant on Fury’s record. However Fury does need the win over Usyk if he is still the unified champion to be considered up there with the ATGs .
     
  11. catchwtboxing

    catchwtboxing Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,990
    37,557
    Jul 4, 2014
    He'll be no more irrelevant to Fury's record than Wlad was to Joshua's. A long reigning champion on your resume is a long reigning champion on your resume.
     
    OvidsExile likes this.
  12. Mickc

    Mickc Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,497
    2,670
    Nov 28, 2015
    Which long reigning Champion does Joshua have on his resume ?
     
  13. catchwtboxing

    catchwtboxing Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,990
    37,557
    Jul 4, 2014
    Wlad. I said so in the statement that you quoted, if you did not know.
     
  14. Mickc

    Mickc Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,497
    2,670
    Nov 28, 2015
    What I do know is that Joshua has yet to beat a long reigning Champion, Wlad did not even have a belt when he fought Joshua and was also coming off a loss. smh
     
    Last edited: Oct 10, 2021
  15. catchwtboxing

    catchwtboxing Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,990
    37,557
    Jul 4, 2014
    You have spectacularly missed the point. The point is that Wlad didn't have the belt, because he was already beaten by Fury, but it is still great win for him.