Alvarez is a 154 Pound Version of RICKY Hatton

If I knew what your point was, I would have addressed it. You made a comment about Alrarez' belt being a REAL World title. THAT is what I was commenting about. Alvarez won a vacant belt vs. an unranked opponents. Just like what Pac did, and NEITHER were the REAL world Champs.

How can I imply anything when I didn't even talk about it? Are you even readion the posts you reply to? For ****'s sake man, don't invent **** just to make a point you think you need to make.

atsch Holy ****...you have no clue WTF I am even saying. This might as well be rambling since no one was even saying that ****...

 

Give yourself a pat on the back there Lance. Im talking about the validity of the WBC belt in comparison to the WBU and you're talking about the price of fish.

 

At this point is the same ****, you're giving too much credit to the WBC. You cant give a fighter credit for fighting a weak guy even if it is for a belt. Is the opponents you fight that makes your reputation not the belts you fight for. Nowadays belts mean nothing they are all meaningless.

:hat

 

Good. Then applying that reasoning why wasn't anyone queuing up to take Hattons WBU belt during his reign of terror as their champ?

 

atsch Weak post. You called Alravez' belt the REAL WORLD TITLE. You were wrong and are now running in cirlces to clarify your statement. Fighters MAKE a belt valid. How has Laravrez made his belt so valid? By beating an unranked WW?

Caleno's belt make be more well known, but it's not any more legit then what Hatton had.

 

What!?!?! That was years ago. Who gives a **** or even remembers every detail of his reign. You're trying to make a debate outta nothing. atsch

 

SUPER FAIL. Hatton won the WBU against a semi retired Freddie Pendalton. Serious WTF was the WBU? It HAD ZERO credibility. The WBC on the other hand clearly has credibility because of its history. Thats why the belt was on the line. As iv already said where's the WBU?
I don't understand how you can give Hatton any credit for his WBU reign but wont give Canelo any credit for winning a RECOGNISED world title belt at 20 years of age.

 

So because it was back in the early 2000's it doesn't matter? atsch
And you seem to lack reading comprehension. Another poster insinuated that Ricky was the better fighter at the same age. As far as im concerned thats CLEARLY NOT the case when Hatton was still kicking around Area Level class at the same age and never had a REAL RECOGNISED world title around his waist.

 

Alvarez should just retire and not risk further damage.

 

atsch You have TOTALLY MISSED THE WHOLE ****IN POINT. Who gives a **** about history? Did Canelo beat HISTORY in the ring? No, he beat Matthew ****in Hatton, a WW.

**** man, you get such a boner to hate on Hatton you don't even know WTF I am talking about.

And again, you are proving you don't even READ what I've said. That's twice now. I didn't say Canelo deserves NO CREDIT, while Hatton deseves it all. **** man...stop inventing **** just to say what you want.

 

Did I say it didn't matter? You aksed specifically why people weren't lining up for Hatton. I said it was YEARS ago, as in no one will remember the specifics of some **** from 5-6 years ago.

I don't give a **** what someo other poster insiuates. Take it up with them. It's obvious YOU don't have the reading comprehenstion to understand what I said, which is odd because it was pretty straight forward and simple. But it still went WAAY over your head. All you wanted to do was hate on Ricky Hatton. Pretty obvious...:roll:

 

Boy you suuuure got me figured out. I point out factual accuracies that you choose to ignore because they dont fit your agenda. You on the other hand are still blabbering on about the price of fish. Expected response from Hatton schill.

 

Chose to ignore? I wasn't talking about anything other then you trying to say Canelo won a REAL World title. And your basis? Because it's a more recognized belt. Yep, that's what you said.

I have no agenda. WTF is my agenda anyway? Tell me that Mr., Smart guy, since you KNOW SO MUCH as to what I am saying. Tell me what you think my stance is here.

You've created the rest up in your head. Making some bul**** debate that doesn't exsist, because that's all you are capable of doing, beng an armchair QB... :roll:

Just a ****in troll.

 

This argument is about as lame as both the WBU and WBC belts you are arguing over.

 

O shut up you bladdy women.