Am I missing something about Danny Garcia?

Who is name calling? Are you imagining things again, or just have difficulty with language?

Hmmm... so I point out a fact regarding what Sam Watson was saying (which anyone can verify for themselves) and the first thing YOU think of is "conspiracy theory"? All I said was that by the body language of the people involved, they clearly knew they lost the fight. Sam would be encouraging Garcia to look good and happy for the cameras regardless of the situation.

I take no responsibility for the ways in which your mind takes facts as presented.

You seem to really be stretching now to try and save face after going ad hominem :conf

 

So that was entire your point of pointing that out, that they knew it was close and maybe could go the other way so be sure keep your composure and look good for the cameras?? The same as what any other team member would or should say in that situation, well wow, thanks for saying so, I feel totally enlightened now!!

 

You are very welcome. With the projecting thing, I was also just trying to be of help. I was not calling you dumb, I was just pointing out that projecting your own feeling on others in public looked it. Hopefully this continues to be an enlightening day for you, friend. :good

 

That's it, just ease on out of the anger and step into the light...it's much warmer here.

 

Glad to make your day, and I'll find where one of the commentator's allude to Herrera breaking down and Paulie agreed (because that's what was happening) for you because I'm sure that'll brighten up your day further to not have to go on living denial, you little truth seeker you...

 

Ok, it's at the end of rd. 11, they said fatiguing but that's obvious sugar coating as he was absolutely being belted to the body all throughout that round and at least to a less extent the previous (but still very much so) and less extents the previous rds. You can't call it simply fatiguing when it coincides with shots being delivered, that's breaking down. You could see him trying to playoff an a hurt look on his face, and that could only come from an accumulation of damage as there was no singular shot to draw that reference from. Danny was doing good work to the body for the majority of the fight and in that round it showed.

 

Funny, I remember Herrera being pretty energetic in the 12th. So much for breaking down.

He also moved a lot better after the fight, Danny looked like he was hungover something fierce. I think your really reaching again. Also, again, WGAF about whatever the announcers were saying. Watch the fight yourself, dont pay too much attention to what the announcers say.

 

lol, people recover from multiple knock down's, so I'm pretty sure they can recover from systematically hurt. So Herrera mustered everything he had left for one final round, big deal, fighter's do that all the time, you shouldn't be fooled by it. And I was watching the fight for myself which can be proven unlike you, as I had Danny winning, again unlike the you, who I can make the case went along with commentator's.

 

Um... the reason its called "breaking down" to the body is because you dont recover from it quickly, unlike many shots to the head. Body damage is much more cumulative. Getting a little wind knocked out of you is not "breaking down". I mean, Danny was the one who looked so beaten up and dejected Sam Watson had to give him a pep talk in front of the microphones.

Do you know anything about boxing?

Your last sentence makes very little sense. You claim to have watched the fight and have Danny winning? I think thats what you are saying, then something about commentators again.

 

That happens when you fall from a body shot, it's the after effect having been broke down which in turn would take a round to recover from. In the process of means you have not been broke down and can still recover rather quickly with like, I don't know, the 60 second rest that Herrera had?? And my language was very clear, apparently you just don't know much about reading.

 

Hmm... a basic grammar comparison tells a vastly different tale. :conf

If you think your writing is "clear" that shows you know about as much about English as you do about boxing. Rosetta Stone may prove worth your money.

 

Nothing left but the insults huh, well, that sucks...for you.

 

Just pointing out the fallacies in your silly claims, and handing out advice.

Interesting that you start with the ad hominem then pretend to take the high road after it doesnt go so well for you.

 

Only one judge can be excluded for having judge unfairly, the other two scored it for it for Danny, try and figure it why, because there is a logical reason.

Edit: The other had it a draw, but it's still nowhere near the one sided schooling people make it out to be.