Am I the only one here who agrees with 117-111?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Sufan4eva13, Jun 22, 2013.


Page 6 of 7
  1. Brian

    Brian Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,890
    0
    Feb 15, 2010
    :deal
     
    Brian, Jun 23, 2013
    Brian, Jun 23, 2013
    #76
  2. benebox

    benebox Active Member Full Member

    889
    7
    Apr 11, 2012
    It was closer to the right score than the judge who had Paulie winning.
     
    benebox, Jun 23, 2013
    benebox, Jun 23, 2013
    #77
  3. Rangersfan1982

    Rangersfan1982 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,832
    1
    May 28, 2009
    Malignaggi was hitting gloves/arms all night. He was well beaten. But Broner should have pushed for the stoppage.
     
    Rangersfan1982, Jun 23, 2013
    Rangersfan1982, Jun 23, 2013
    #78
  4. Xerant

    Xerant Gotta Hate negociations! Full Member

    4,822
    3
    May 11, 2009
    Paulie took 3 of the first 4 on my card too then he got a beating. Broner did not carry his power 2 weight class and Paulie always shown a good chin. Paulie still got a beating.
     
    Xerant, Jun 23, 2013
    Xerant, Jun 23, 2013
    #79
  5. floyd_g.o.a.t

    floyd_g.o.a.t Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,735
    5
    Aug 7, 2010
    117-111 is perfectly fine.

    116-112 is probably fairer.
     
    floyd_g.o.a.t, Jun 23, 2013
    floyd_g.o.a.t, Jun 23, 2013
    #80
  6. pngo

    pngo #1Contender Full Member

    7,543
    1
    Apr 24, 2007
    Seriously Paulie won 4 rounds at best in my card. He was basically only hitting his jab every now and then. Broner had the cleaner most effective shots throughout the entire fight.
     
    pngo, Jun 23, 2013
    pngo, Jun 23, 2013
    #81
  7. kayden

    kayden New Member Full Member

    28
    0
    Mar 29, 2010
    Not a broner or a PM fan,but at end of fight,I would have rather been Broner ,looked like Paulie had been in a fight.:hey
     
    kayden, Jun 23, 2013
    kayden, Jun 23, 2013
    #82
  8. Sufan4eva13

    Sufan4eva13 Member Full Member

    209
    0
    Jul 11, 2009
    Just rewatched the fight, and honestly, after watching it and analyzing it a second time anyone who had this closer then 7-5 Broner at the end is a complete tool who is blinded by their hatred of Broner. I think to find 5 rounds to give to Paulie you really have to look hard. Even a second time, to me this looks like a textbook 117-111 or 116-112 fight. Paulie won 1, 2 and 4, I can see an argument for Paulie taking the 10th, and if you're being REALLY REALLY generous I can see an argument for Paulie taking the 12th, but if you actually look closely at what landed, what didn't and how hard the shots were Broner was dominant in this fight. Paulie couldn't touch him. It was something of a fantastic defensive performance really. Does he need to be more active? Yeah, but at least admit that the mans defense was elite last night. It was very, very impressive how many Malignaggi shots he absorbed into his defense.
     
    Sufan4eva13, Jun 23, 2013
    Sufan4eva13, Jun 23, 2013
    #83
  9. P4P-Ruler

    P4P-Ruler Active Member Full Member

    975
    0
    Apr 14, 2013
    Come on 117-111 is like Froch Ward type fight. Paulie threw 800 punches and landed a good quarter with the first 2-3 rounds clearly his. He was always in it, that card was an insult.

    Banks losing to Mitchell was more like 117-111 not the main event. 115-113 is OK.
     
    P4P-Ruler, Jun 23, 2013
    P4P-Ruler, Jun 23, 2013
    #84
  10. Big_Bill_Bronzy

    Big_Bill_Bronzy Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,546
    3
    Apr 23, 2009
    The funny thing is that the only judge who had a perfect night is Tom Schreck(117-111).

    This means that in each of the twelve rounds, at least one other judge scored like him.

    Tom Miller did an awful job(4 rounds). He should be banned.
     
    Big_Bill_Bronzy, Jun 23, 2013
    Big_Bill_Bronzy, Jun 23, 2013
    #85
  11. victor879

    victor879 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,017
    42
    Dec 1, 2007
    :deal Paulie didn't win a round after the 4th. If you're generous, it's 116-112 on your final. (Giving Paulie a later sympathy round) I don't give rounds for shoe shining when you're eating hard shots.... I had it 117-111 as well.

    NO ****ING WAY DID PAULIE WIN 6-7 ROUNDS!! Anybody saying he was "robbed" should stick to watching the amateurs with computerized scoring. ****ing idiot punch statistic junkies. :lol:
     
    victor879, Jun 23, 2013
    victor879, Jun 23, 2013
    #86
  12. Sufan4eva13

    Sufan4eva13 Member Full Member

    209
    0
    Jul 11, 2009
    The worst part of it is that even the compubox stats favor Broner pretty much overwhelmingly if you consider power shots to be worth more than jabs. He outlanded Paulie by 31 total punches. Even by the amateur scoring that completely takes the effectiveness of a punch out of the equation Broner STILL won this fight. When you add in the fact that Broner was hitting him with head snapping punches while Paulie was tapping Broner it makes the blowout even more obvious.


     
    Sufan4eva13, Jun 23, 2013
    Sufan4eva13, Jun 23, 2013
    #87
  13. Bad Boyz

    Bad Boyz Sportscenter Full Member

    2,518
    1
    Aug 30, 2011
    Tom Schreck's exact scorecard.
     
    Bad Boyz, Jun 23, 2013
    Bad Boyz, Jun 23, 2013
    #88
  14. Sinew

    Sinew The Assassin Full Member

    5,125
    191
    Feb 7, 2005

    joke post
     
    Sinew, Jun 23, 2013
    Sinew, Jun 23, 2013
    #89
  15. victor879

    victor879 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,017
    42
    Dec 1, 2007
    Paulie got his ass kicked in the 5th.......... wtf.
     
    victor879, Jun 23, 2013
    victor879, Jun 23, 2013
    #90
Page 6 of 7