Am I the only one who didn't have Marquez winning ANY of the fights?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Godhead, Nov 15, 2012.


  1. timeout

    timeout Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,718
    3,533
    Jun 15, 2010
    This content is protected


    This content is protected


    third fight was close.

    but Marqueer still lost.
     
  2. Xerant

    Xerant Gotta Hate negociations! Full Member

    4,822
    4
    May 11, 2009
    Wel im no *******. You can even go trough my post aint a pac lover. And still its hard scoring fight for marquez. I had the third fight for Pac. But then I had timmy up 2 rounds so maybe i dont know **** :)
     
  3. CrossedLine

    CrossedLine Active Member Full Member

    1,213
    2
    Jul 23, 2011
  4. Godhead

    Godhead Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,649
    21
    Jan 26, 2010
    I'm not a Pacquiao fan, in fact I'm not a fan of any boxer, I just watch boxing. A robbery is when 1 fighter clearly beats the other fight. Outside of the 1st fight when Marquez was coming back from those early round knockouts, he never CLEARLY wins a round.


    I bet you goof balls don't even score the fight 10-8 when a guy is knocked down. What you all do is at the end of the fight you say who you THINK won and that's probably the guy who looked the best the last few rounds that's fresh in your memory.

    I remember a fight on here a few years back when everybody was saying it was a robbery because the loser won the last 3 rounds, guy hadn't won any rounds prior to that.
     
  5. Godhead

    Godhead Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,649
    21
    Jan 26, 2010

    Hey goofball, how do you "boxed somebody's ears off" when you sit back and wait to counter the whole fight? Marquez never goes on the offense, all he does is wait to counter. Pacquiao lands the most shots and is the aggressor. Everytime Marquez swings in audience screams.

    I'm not even a Pacquiao fan..in fact I got banned from Philboxing for saying I think he uses TRT (testerone replacement therapy)
     
  6. CrossedLine

    CrossedLine Active Member Full Member

    1,213
    2
    Jul 23, 2011
    You remember that? Wow totally impressed. History repeats itself right? I'm sure most of the goofballs who were saying that are here and saying this was a robbery too. Good work,Nancy, thanks.
     
  7. theboy_racer

    theboy_racer Boxing Junkie banned

    8,843
    5
    Mar 4, 2006
    First one was the most one sided in JMM's favour (he dominated Pac) but close to score due to the first round, i have JMM by a point.

    Second was the closest of the fights but a clear win by 2-3 pts for JMM

    Third fight was the easiest to score, no knockdowns and JMM won 8 or 9 of the rounds.


    JMM 3-0 PAC
     
  8. lester proctor

    lester proctor Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,393
    1
    Jul 2, 2011
    http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/Manny_Pacquiao_vs._Juan_Manuel_Marquez_(3rd_meeting)

     
  9. kirk

    kirk l l l Staff Member

    71,740
    29,400
    Jul 26, 2004
    The first two were too close to call, I felt JMM won the third.
     
  10. markq

    markq Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,453
    7
    Apr 26, 2010
    I think all three fights were flip of the coin at the end. I had JMM winning 2 of the 3 (1st and 3rd fight) but the decisions weren't out of line with how close I scored them. I'm definitely not a PEDcquiao fan. JMM could easily be 3-0 against PEDcquiao under other judges.
     
  11. duranimal

    duranimal Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,611
    38
    Jan 4, 2009
    1st fight clear win for Pacman:yep

    2nd fight def win for Marquez:yep

    3rd fight 1 point either way or a draw:yep

    All 3 could have gone either way depending on what you see & like, 4th fight will be repeat of above & fight 50 will be repeat of previous 49:deal
     
  12. Box702

    Box702 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,576
    0
    Oct 23, 2012
    Correct.Lets just end this once in for all.Pacs only claim to victory is 4 knockdowns (& 3 were in 1st fight) they know speed doesn't matter if you can't consistently land vs a much better boxer in JMM.You can argue Marquez won all 3.I'll accept the draw in the first fight but Marquez clearly won the last two fights every time more convincingly landing the more cleaner & effective punches.Heres how the third fight & really all 3 fights went down.Why do people claim pac won even 2 fights he struggled in all 3 & hasnt knocked marquez down since 2008.Overrated pac should retire so his fan bias bandwagon fans can all retire with him for good.

    Clear proof Marquez won by wide margin.Decoding JMM-pac people need really to take their blind folds off it's getting old & annoying.Forget what the corrupt judges scorecards are Arum has been caught bribing judges & if abril-rios/pac-bradley wasn't enough clear evidence.

    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GfBmqlO6rh4[/ame] :deal
     
  13. Scar

    Scar VIP Member

    76,131
    2,773
    Jul 20, 2004
    No you're not, they are all 50/50 fights. I personally had Pacquiao winning the first two but losing the third.
     
  14. illwill007

    illwill007 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,903
    1
    Apr 10, 2010
    This. Just like Mayweather/Castillo I.
     
  15. Spitfire7

    Spitfire7 Gadfly Full Member

    4,498
    2
    May 18, 2007
    :goodPerhaps the most overplayed dvd from my recent collection, and still feeling the same as you in retrospect after...