Am I the only one who thinks Chad Dawson should have been disqualified?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Money, Oct 15, 2011.


  1. Money

    Money Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,968
    20
    Apr 29, 2008
    I mean seriously that spinebuster he put on Hopkins was illegal as ****!
     
  2. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    hard to say cause

    1) Dawson's foul was a response to a foul from Hopkins (though I think Dawson did bend below the waist which is illegal)

    2) We don't know if Hopkins was just acting it out.
     
  3. DocLouis

    DocLouis Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,127
    0
    Oct 14, 2009
    Nah, it didn't look that serious in realtime. NC if anything.

    BHop's just old. If he were 20 years younger he woulda shook it off.
     
  4. Delroc

    Delroc Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,324
    7
    Jan 14, 2009
    Hopkins is a joke
     
  5. jisi

    jisi Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,272
    1
    Feb 25, 2006
    :good

    The right way. Chambers fould Wlad and nobody here on ESB was claiming

    Foul, Foul, than it was "Wlad´s fault"!!! It you lean on the back of your opponent, it can happen that your opponent reacts like that. Wladimir was not claiming anything, he was continuiing fighting, but Wlad was hurt after this attack from Chambers! Wlad was not acting, recovering and knock Chambers out.


    This content is protected
     
  6. Reppin501

    Reppin501 The People's Champ Full Member

    21,943
    3,300
    Apr 26, 2010
    For what? Hopkins tried to pull some bully **** on Dawson, and Dawson wasn't having it, so BHOP took the ***** way out. This wasn't Pascal he was in the ring with, and he knew he was about to get ****ed up, that was seriously disgusting, and Dawson getting DQ'd would have been a travesty.
     
  7. alexanderkareli

    alexanderkareli Member Full Member

    456
    2
    Jan 31, 2010
    dawson did everything 100% right. hopkins was doing his streetfighting **** like when he pushed chad and kept hitting him. bhop was leaning and chad threw him off, theres nothing wrong with that. then bhop does his acting. i gained so much respect for chad when he called hopkins a ***** in the middle of the ring. i was so happy when it was announced a tko instead of a no contest.
     
  8. CYoungblood95

    CYoungblood95 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,969
    0
    Dec 28, 2009
    no, chad did wat he was supposed to do. Bernard jumped on his back, he (Chad) shoulder'd him on some '***** get off me' type ****
     
  9. elTerrible

    elTerrible TeamElite General Manager Full Member

    11,392
    15
    May 24, 2006
    He did shake off a bodyslam in echols 2:deal
     
  10. Kampioni

    Kampioni Good Boy Full Member

    5,850
    10
    May 23, 2007
    hopkins is a *****
     
  11. Money

    Money Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,968
    20
    Apr 29, 2008
    why the **** does one foul justify another foul? you can't just slam fighters like that.
     
  12. Punch_Drunk

    Punch_Drunk The Sweet Science Full Member

    136
    0
    May 22, 2011
    I wish it was a NC but I think hopkins was faking
     
  13. jisi

    jisi Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,272
    1
    Feb 25, 2006
    I do not justify it.

    Both times it was a foul. But both times the boxer leaned on the back of the opponent.

    In my opinion this fight (Hopkins vs. Dawson) should by NC.

    I dislike the behavior from Hopkns. Hopkins uses "dirty tactics" so he should not crying like a baby when another fighter uses "dirty" tactics. He uses his had in the first round to hurt Dawson!
     
  14. compukiller

    compukiller Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,428
    6
    Mar 4, 2006
    Yes, he should have been dq'ed, that was ****ing disgraceful.
     
  15. pngo

    pngo #1Contender Full Member

    7,543
    1
    Apr 24, 2007
    Hopkins did it once before where he pushed Dawson down, the second time Dawson got pissed and just threw him off his shoulder.