Am I the only one who thought Joe Cortez...

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by JimboDs, Dec 10, 2007.


  1. JimboDs

    JimboDs So-called expert Full Member

    244
    0
    Sep 21, 2007
    ... did a terrible Job ref'ing that fight?

    I know that people tend to see fights differently depending on what kinds of styles they like, who they want to win, etc., but this is how I saw it:

    It seemed to me that Cortez was determined to not allow that bout to be an inside fight and I go so far as to say that he was crooked in favor Mayweather:

    1) He broke the fighters prematurely on several occasions instead of letting the in-fighting take it's due course. An inside fight was Hatton's only chance at victory over the faster/craftier boxer.

    2) He never warned Floyd for clinching even though he was doing it constantly. Granted, Mayweather was slick enough to do it on the opposite side of Cortez almost every time, but Cortez wasn't making much of an effort to catch him.

    3) Cortez warned Mayweather for using his forearms ONCE when he used them (and his elbows a few times) constantly and often blatantly when Hatton made it inside. No point was ever taken.

    4) Cortez penalized Hatton for hitting Floyd on the back of the head when every instance was the result Floyd either turning around or bending way over. So what is Hatton supposed to do when he has Floyd trapped on the ropes or in the corner? Let him out and not hit him Just because Mayweather won't face him?

    The whole thing stunk to me. I'm not saying Hatton would have won, but I think he did abandon his gameplan and lose his composure as a result of the poor ref'ing.

    It's a shame because I think it would have been a much better fight.

    By the way, I don't have an extreme dislike for Floyd like a lot of people do, but I do have a tendency to pull for the underdog in most fights. This is just the way I saw it.
     
  2. they_killed_kenny

    they_killed_kenny Underdogs on top :) Full Member

    1,461
    0
    Aug 1, 2004
    Smoger shoulda been the referee......he would have let hatton got for 1 more rnd.................

    ..............just to get his ass whooped even more in the next :hey
     
  3. Slothrop

    Slothrop Boxing Junkie banned

    11,540
    2
    Nov 25, 2004
    Yeah, he did a shitty job.
     
  4. BOSTONREDSOX

    BOSTONREDSOX The Ghost Full Member

    2,048
    0
    Dec 10, 2007
  5. they_killed_kenny

    they_killed_kenny Underdogs on top :) Full Member

    1,461
    0
    Aug 1, 2004
    Oh yeah sorry about that, thats not the topic :oops:


    Cortez did not do a good job, like u said he stop the action even before a clinch, watch carefully and ull see, and the point deduction can be agued but i believe he shoulda gave floyd at least a warning for holding and turning his head too, at least a warning u know....

    Cortez was not a good choice, Smogger shoudla been :yep
     
  6. Brooklyn Boxer

    Brooklyn Boxer Active Member Full Member

    1,232
    0
    Sep 8, 2007
    I think he did alright. He did have his bad moments like taking a point away but I don't have a problem with breaking them up because he didn't want Hatton to hold him and make it a holding contest. He had better nights but I don't he was paid off or something.
     
  7. JimboDs

    JimboDs So-called expert Full Member

    244
    0
    Sep 21, 2007
    Hatton wasn't getting inside to hold though. Floyd was doing the majority of the holding. He was trying to get into position to punch at close range so that he could nullify Mayweather's speed and reach advantage. He would have been an idiot to try and box Mayweather from the outside. By getting in close and throwing short punches, he was getting Mayweather in the corner or on the ropes where he couldn't use all his tools. It was a good strategy, but the Ref not only broke them several times before they were tangled up, but did nothing about Floyd's holding or blatant elbows and forearms to Ricky's face when he was on the ropes.
     
  8. djm

    djm Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,208
    2
    Dec 17, 2006
    Poor job - if this many people are talking about the ref, it can't be a good thing; especially when everone agrees the result would have been the same. A better reffing job just would have meant a better fight, but not necessarily a different result.
     
  9. Symphenyceo

    Symphenyceo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,778
    40
    Nov 16, 2007
    haton fans complain about this fight but see nothing wrong with the tszyu fight
     
  10. HandsOfGold

    HandsOfGold Member Full Member

    477
    0
    Jul 19, 2004
    It's Joe Cortez's world. We're just living in it.
     
  11. Beckjl

    Beckjl Member Full Member

    422
    1
    May 7, 2006
    If you are watching a good ref you don't even know he is there.
     
  12. It's all a moot point, Hatton was not going to win no matter who the ref was..:roll:
     
  13. Ric Zenbach

    Ric Zenbach New Member Full Member

    18
    0
    Dec 7, 2007
    If we were in school, I'd give him a C+. He was not all that great, but referees are always sterio-typed as being blind you know? I am sure he'll see a replay and think "****, I missed that one." I refereed wrestling before, and you need to think fast in a good match, as fast as the competitors. Also, NFL refs' get instant replay, combat sports do not. I noticed in round 9 Hatton DRILLED Mayweather in the back of the head with a hammer punch, WAY illegal. Cortez did nothing. I think you imply he was one sided to Mayweather's side, I say he just was not as good as many other refs' could have been. In absolutely no way shape or form was there any fix though.
     
  14. JimboDs

    JimboDs So-called expert Full Member

    244
    0
    Sep 21, 2007
    I'm not a Hatton fan. I'm just a boxing fan that paid 54.95 to watch this fight and thought that it was shittier because of Joe Cortez.
     
  15. Symphenyceo

    Symphenyceo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,778
    40
    Nov 16, 2007
    i payed for the fight also and i didnt want a wrestling match