im an american .. id have to diagree with you on a few things 1 being i do belive the pool of talent here is deeper ... but i think non american fighter or just as good as american but dont get alot of exposure or they refuse to leave there country ala Joe C.... an thats what makes most people mad but IMO it doesnt matter where your from wat color or ne thing its just hard work an dedication
What im trying to pioint out is, if Soviets had been able to fight in the past, and the Mob hadnt had monopoly on the belt then the past WBC holders list would look alot different.
But really why should he leave? Stay at home fight the best the US had to offer 'Lacy', the best Europe had to offer 'Kessler' infront of 50,000 or go to the US beat on aload of over-hyped bums like Dawson infront of 10-18k?
Primo Carnera, a mob-controlled HW champion, defended his title in Spain against a non-American. Joe Louis defended the hw title against fighters not from the U.S. such as Tommy Farr, Max Schmeling, and Arturo Godoy. Floyd Patterson defended the HW title against Europeans such as Brian London and Ingemar Johannson. Mob rule in boxing more or less dissolved in the early 60s after the IBC dissolved and Frankie Carbo was incarcarated. The mafia had nowhere near the strangehold on boxing as it had in the past and did not control much. The rise of the East Europeans in the heavyweight division has to do with them actually being able to compete professionally rather than the Mob. If they had been allowed to compete professionally post IBC/Norris-era and pre-1990s, there would have been more successful East Europeans in boxing. The Mafia had nothing to do with that.
Some Americans seem to treat the elite boxing matches as their divine right and they feel they are the superpower the simple fact is all Americans have now is the venues and a few fighters coming to the end of their career. Personally i think we wil see alot more big fights held in England due to the folowing fighters get as wel as the venues and the increasing talent in European boxing. Maybe the mecca of boxing doesnt exist im sure its the fighters who make the fights. Look at Hatton im sure he would have got a big crowd if he fought anywhere in the world Australia or Greenland. Great fighters make great fights venue is irrelevant. Sure the odd bout in Vegas is good as is the Garden however atmosphere wise where can beat the Millenium Stadium and MEN arena? I think its time for American fight fans to accept there are more fighters out there than their own and that these fighters do not have to go to America to prove themselves, surely great fights is more important than location when deciding on the fighter(s) in questions ability
I think you nailed it on the head. I also think people forget just how big the United States really is. It is a massive country and most Americans will never see a great percentage of the country.
its not that big! Canada (not including Alaska), India, Russia, China, are all bigger. I bet more than 10% of Canadians have passports.
WHU, with all due respect comparing the MEN arena to MSG is completely absurd. Yes, Hatton can draw a lot of fan their which probably makes for an electric atmosphere, but in reguards to tradition, history, and fighters their is nocomprison. Why would a fighter not want to fight MSG?
I agree for the most part...The thing is, Calzaghe has been big enough for a few years already to have come to the USA to fight. Now, I am not saying he has to, and I don't fault him if he doesn't. JC has the right to fight who he wents, where he wants, in whatever weight class he wants. But, I have the right to not feel as though he has proven himself to the degree that other fighters have. I agree that the 0 in boxers records is largely irrelevant given the greatness many champions with 5 or 10 losses. I respect the risks...DLH going from 130-160 was a huge risk. Talk **** if you want, but he stepped up, and he fights BIG FIGHTS. Mosley got beaten up by Forrest, and immediately rematched him...He got beaten by Wright, and immediately rematched him. I respect that. If RJJ stayed at 168, would he have been regarded as being as great as he is? If James Toney didn't eat himself out of 168, would he have gotten the same respect? If Duran just dominated 135, would he have been the same? I don't think so...It was the RISKS and the BIG FIGHT mentality that made these fighters great...So far, JC hasn't done much of either...
Without getting too into this post (I leave for work in about 15 mins)...I think you are taking a very "rose colored glass" outlook on this. In other words, you may be able to see clearly from one side, but you fail to see the other side of the arguement. Again, I will get into this in alot more detail when I get home from work, but to keep it simple, the very crux of your rant/problem/question could easily be flipped from the opposite angle. There is a much larger % of non-US posters on this very site that dismiss any US fighter as hype...that build their own fighter up to ridiculously lofty standards (anyone remember CHJ's post about Calzaghe's resume and skills being on par with SRR's???)...its natural to root for the hometown guy. I myself am a fan of the sport first, fighters second. Joe Calzaghe is one of my favorite all time fighters....and was so, LONG BEFORE the Lacy/Kessler wins. Nationality should NEVER be part of an arguement about a fighters skills and greatness....skills and greatness should be the end all, be all of that conversation. But even yourself are guilty of this outlook (comparing the Kessler and Lacy wins as favorable or even with Hopkins biggest wins...which is FAR from reality). The words Americanized and American bias are thrown out on this site much more than the other way around is. If you open your eyes to it, you will realize just how off your post was (tho I do admit there is a large amount of american posters who are guilty of it....but your basing the majority on the minority). Again, I am out the door as I type this, but I will be back later to add more clarity to this subject (as I KNOW, plenty of posters will agree and disagree with me here).
Many times, you make more fighting in the USA in front of 10,000 people then you would in Europe in front of 50,000 people. Besides, maybe JC would get more respect if he won on someone else's turf, while being booed, instead of being cheered...just a thought.
I totally agree it is historic and carries great tradition however the truth is boxing is a business and most fighters want as man 0s in their bank balance as possible therefoewe they do not have to fight at these venures. Also bums on seats makes money and great amosphere can also be an influence on a fighters decision. WOuld a fighter want thousands screaming his name or to fight at a historcial venue. I think the answer is it depends on the personality and personal preferences of the individual.
I've been reading the forum here for years and this is my first response. Most of the americans on this site are jack assess. Don't judge all of us from what you read on the forum. I believe European countries are smaller and closer that is why they have more passports. Some americans are just ignorant and don't see the need to travel regardless of what your country has or doesn't have. Fighters from all over the world can be great and I personally enjoy watching how the european and american styles match up. As far as non-americans being inferior in our minds I don't think thats true to the real boxing fans here. It's just hard to get excited against someone you don't see on live tv. This may or may not be true but I think our talent has been a little deeper especially in the past. We're not too trusting of a foreign fighter that has never fought outside of a small country for their entire career until we see them match up to a fighter we are familiar with. Fight like Calzage v Lacy just help to make more educated assessment of a world wide sport. By the way, Lacy is hardly the best we have to offer.
I agree with you maybe my post was one sided however it was not meant as a dig at americans although i can see it has come across this way. The motive of this post was to explore the meaning of a great fighter, and the question was does a fighter need to be percieved great by the AMericna society to be justifiably deemed great as America like it or not is the powerhouse in terms of boxing opinion. I think one thing is common in every opinion and that is the way boxing is run, im sure criticims and analysis of the running of boxing would provide many interesting lines of view and a variety of opinions