American super middleweights of the last 10 years and some questions

who is your current favorite fighter still in the game:-

Enzo Macrenelli
Nathan Cleverly?

who

 

First you ducked my 10 - 0 thrashing,

now you ducked my latest dismantling off you.

Now you jumping on trampies dick, even though I pwned him already

 

Until the last couple years, most Americans that are natural supermiddles have chosen to fight at the glamour divisions of lightheavy or middleweight as they hold much more prestige than the short lived existence of supermiddle.

 

I exposed bailey for being a clear cut nutthugger with a Calzaghe agenda.

This thread had nothing to do with Calzaghe but bailey couldnt help himself



Thats what you call serious pwnage

 

Your response only touched on 3/10 points and you failed in that attempt. Try again and break it down. Until now that 10 - 0 whitewash thrashing still stands.

:huh you stuck to the fighters from those years, (I thought we only discussing 2005) then you moved on (you mean duck) and now focusing on those fighter :blood and then you blowed something keep them homo fantasies of yours out of here.

Regardless, the resume and wins of the SMW of 2011 > the resume and wins of the SMW of 2005.

You still aint responded and only failed in a 3/10 effort.

Hopkins was ranked number 10 MW back in 93 - 94. Then in 2002 becomes P4P #1. So according to your logic, Hopkins was a tougher opponent back in 93 - 94.atsch

I just mentioned BEASTLY PEPE schooled you on Lacy being a bum.

You mentioned Syd Vanderpools boxrec in reply.

I found that foolish.

Froch is a better fighter with his limitations than Jeff Lacy has ever been.

You call me religious, then call me a loner and then say I cant get a relationship.

What do these false accusations got to do with 2005 SMW vs 2011 SMW. Are you that hurt that you have to resort to lies and allegations.

You the one making false accusations, stick to the topic in hand. You seem to be interested in my religious affairs and the women I deal with. then you complain the posts are getting too long atsch

Bring that advert when I said im religious, dont duck like Calzaghe did with Pavlik, Pascal, Froch, Hopkins II, Dawson, Johnson..... Prime RJJ, Cloud, Dirrell, Ward, Abraham.....

How comes Veit has never ever been in the ring annual ranks. Not the year before Calzaghe beat him. Not the year after Calzaghe beat him. Not in the year Calzaghe beat him. Not even when he beat Braehmer coz he got KO'd in the rematch.

National level. Salem got 2 points deducted and still took it to a SD.

Veit was a grade A german hypejob.

Veit got a MD, and then got KO'd in 4 rounds in the rematch. Maybe Calzaghe felt he would see a similar fate so didnt rematch Hopkins.

Veit was **** and is only rated by ***zaghis:deal

 

Its clear you dont want to continue.

Some of the events that took place:-

1. You claim 2005 SMW are better than the ones today

I challenged your claim, and posted a 10 - 0 thrashing of your claims which went unanswered.

2. You made an embarrsing attempt to try and challenge the 10 - 0 thrashing and only touched on 3/10 of the points and failed.

I challenged you once again to challeneg the full 10 - 0 thrashing but you changed the subject.

3. You claimed Mario Veit is a better fighter than Jermain Taylor

No comments required

4. I repeat you got schooled by BEASTLY PEPE on the subject that Jeff Lacy was a bum

You mention Syd Vanderpools boxrec

5. You make false accusations about me advertising myself to be religious.

I challenged you to bring forth the "advert" and you ducked the whole situation.

6. You tried to liken Froch with Jeff Lacy

I said to you straight thats bull****, you never spoke of this again. Case closed there.

7. You claimed Kessler's resume in 2005 is better than Froch's in 2011

I explained Kessler's best wins were Siaca and Mundine, while Froch's best wins are alot better, You then changed the whole criteria to Kessler vs Froch 2010, that had nothing to do with the topic as a form of retreat.

8. You started a thread about American SMW but you love for Calzaghe led you to start talking about Mario Veit.

No comment required

9. You indicated Manny Siaca is a better fighter than Jermain Taylor because Siaca won a title at SMW and Taylor didnt.

I showed you Siaca won vacant titles.

10. You couldnt handle the pwnages so began talking about religion and my women

I calmed you down and brang you back on topic

Conclusion

You got owned once again with another 10 - 0 Thrashing

 

You admit you only attempted 3 of the 10 points, which I countered so the 10 - 0 thrashing still stands.

Jermain Taylor was a much better fighter than Mario Veit.

Taylor also has been ranked in the top 10 while Veit hasnt.

Taylor had stamina and chin problems, other than that shits over Veit when it comes to punching power, jab, speed, skilll......

The point you quoted had nothing to do with boxrec, but for some reason to duck the whole point you made it about boxrec

Tell me once where I mentioned it, bring your proof. Regardless religious or not, you aint answered two 10 - 0 whitewas thrashings

Answer this question, who is a better fighter Froch or Lacy.

You claim Kessler had double vision in that fight atsch

to duck the situation you pull out the boxrec card that I schooled you on.

Regardless whether I bought him up or you did, Veit is ****, was **** and probably remain ****.

You probably think Pascal is a better LHW than Sugar Ray Robinson.

A religious person doesnt swear and doesnt talk about ur wife. You know those two things I done before havent you, but you still want to call me religious.

The answer to this is simply the 10 -0 whitewash thrashing I gave earlier that you failed in the attempt to answer it.

 

You clearly dont want it.

two clear cut phenonominal 10 - 0 whitewash thrashings that had you on ***** street.

:-(

The topic was 2005 SMW division vs 2011 SMW division, as was your claim.

But you still carry on talking about what the 2005 SMW did in 2006. Stick to your claim son.

 

This content is protected