American super middleweights of the last 10 years and some questions

You still aint got an answer for that 10 - 0 thrashing I posted.

Stick by your point:-

You said the competition in the SMW division in 2005 was alot stronger than the one today. But because you couldnt prove it now you mentioning other years.

Becasue that 10 - 0 masterpiece I dropped earlier, of which you failed in the attempt to answer by only touching on 3/10 of the points I raised.

That 10 - 0 thrashing still aint answered.

Only Andrade is still in todays top 10, and that 10 - 0 whitewash already touched upon that, but you ducked the whole post.

Thats why when BEASTLY PEPE schooled you on the skills of Jeff Lacy, you went to Vanderpools Boxrec in an instant.

Again you bring religion into it, when did I talk about religion before. You accused me of being a liar, then you come here and talk without any reliable source. I never claimed to be to be religious, matter of fact I have been pwning you with some violent insults for months something a religious man doesnt do, and you mention religion hoping I would lay off.

Show me a source.

Go and check the annual ratings, he was never respected, only Calzaghe fans seem to rate him. Veit was a **** fighter, and also wasnt in the top 10 of 2005.

 

Kessler beat Froch, Calzaghe beat Kessler.
If old Calzaghe was in the super six Calzaghe would win it and that includes Kessler, Froch and Ward, Ward has had every fight in his living room, unbelievable.

Calzaghe being better than his generation and the current generation tells us what we already know and that is Calzaghe is a hall of famer, whether boxers from 5 or 10 years ago are better than now is irrelevant as Calzaghe woud have beaten them all, if I had to say I would say that the previous generation was better than this one, look how long Calzaghe went on for, look at Hopkins still beating the youngsters.

 

Mosley > Margarito > Cotto > Mosley :huh > Margarito > Cotto > Quintana > Williams > Wright > Mosley :huh > Mayorga > Forrest > Mosley :huh > Mayorga > Forrest < Mora = Mosley :huh

Just because A beat B, and B beat C, dont mean A beats C.

Styles make fights, Calzaghe the one who didnt want the fight with Froch.

I agree Ward has some hometown advantage.

Calzaghe had difficulties with BHop when Hopkins either fought too close at range or was too far out. Ward has shown vs Kessler and Allan Green than he is very good at controlling range, so Ward would have been a difficult opponent for Calzaghe based on these points. Ward has youth and stamina and would be able to do it full 12 rounds unlike Hopkins.

Calzaghe didnt want to mess with Froch.

Hopkins using his experience to beat these youth in no way indicates the previous generation was tougher than the ones today. Hopkins is not even a SMW.

The only reason Calzaghe went on was because his generation was ****. The only reason Calzaghe went off because this generation was too tough for him and he realised he was developing a glass jaw getting dropped by 40 year olds who had lost their punching power.

 

Im dealing in facts, Calzaghe beat Hopkins {away}, Calzaghe beat Kessler and of course Kessler beat Froch, you only deal in fantasy.

 

You make this accusation. Lets take a lot at your previous post:-

Thats fantasy right there.

 

And here is the facts, Calzaghe beat Hopkins {away}, Calzaghe beat Kessler and of course Kessler beat Froch.

 

That was not what I disputed, you made a baseless allegation that I deal with fantasy.

I made a counter accusation that it is you who is guilty of this not me here is the proof:-

You allegation was baseless and I proved it wrong. While I handed over proof.

Conclusion: you got owned like bailey

 

delete

 

Are you a Carl Froch fan and or a Bernard Hopkins fan realsoulja ?, nothing wrong at all if you are.

 

Both.

 

:nut

 

How thick and stupid are you :nut, back in the day I had to advise Dinamita and then he took a different stance on certain aliases he uses, you cant make out that Hopkins is great and Froch is great and Calzaghe is crap.

The reason being is Calzaghe beat Hopkins {away}, Calzaghe beat Kessler and Kessler beat Froch.

Either Calzaghe and Hopkins are both great or neither of them are great, Froch at this stage is good but not great, calling Calzaghe rubbish does not do Hopkins and Froch any favours, if you cant see that you really are dumb.

 

if I rank Calzaghe, Hopkins and Froch. This is how I rank em.

Hopkins
Calzaghe
Froch.

Froch fights anyone, anytime anywhere, so thats why I am fan of him.

I been a fan of BHop since day.

 

Penny dropping is it, good, have more respect next time and think of the big picture regarding your two favourite boxers.