Amir can or Amir Con ?

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by UndisputedUK, Jul 18, 2009.


Page 2 of 2
  1. UndisputedUK

    UndisputedUK Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,152
    1
    Feb 20, 2006
    I agree, he has experience with many styles.. Maidana, M'Baye, Witter and Rees. He handled them all to a great extent and on the road.

    Also those he had close decisions with were very durable in general.
     
    UndisputedUK, Jul 18, 2009
    UndisputedUK, Jul 18, 2009
    #16
  2. PrideOfWales

    PrideOfWales Winston Zedmore Full Member

    11,684
    1
    Apr 20, 2006
    yes​

    he​

    can !​
     
    PrideOfWales, Jul 18, 2009
    PrideOfWales, Jul 18, 2009
    #17
  3. itrymariti

    itrymariti Cañas! Full Member

    13,728
    47
    Sep 6, 2008
    I really don't know why Roach took this fight. It's a stylistic nightmare, and he's taking on an under-rated (i.e. high risk, low reward) fighter. Seems silly to me.
     
    itrymariti, Jul 18, 2009
    itrymariti, Jul 18, 2009
    #18
  4. monkman

    monkman New Member Full Member

    10
    0
    Jul 18, 2009
    If Khan gets ko'd tonight he's got to be a con. Out of interest can anyone remember if he'd signed the PPV deal before the Prescott fight?

    Another thing that I don't fully understand is the impact Roach is having on peoples opinion. Yes he must be doing a good job etc given his record, I read somewhere a post that said Roach "decided to train Khan" - does the boxer have to pay to be trained? I mean if they'd offered Roach an absolute fortune that he couldn't refuse, and Khan was ****, would he still train him? I bet he would. I think there's a lot of opinion that Roach somehow went after Khan and begged to train him.

    This fight should be sponsered by Loctite.
     
    monkman, Jul 18, 2009
    monkman, Jul 18, 2009
    #19
Page 2 of 2