Amir Khan 1 Sky PPV 0

I don't know, maybe I'm being stupid/missing something. But I still don't understand how it will be cheaper for us. Sky and Primetime will compete to get a fight (I don't know how the payments work, a percentage of the revenue?), but that would mean Khan's team gaining more money. Then to cover there higher costs, the channel (whether it be Sky or Primetime) will have to sell more, or increase the price marginally for the same number of customers.

And with the PPV car comparison, the PPV is the only place you can buy that specific fight, so you can't shop around looking for cheaper prices.

As I said maybe I'm missing something, but Khan will probably be back on Sky in 2012.

 

That is the point! With only 1 compnay in the mix they can shaft us how they want to and for as much as they want to.

 

If a Khan-Mayweather fight happens then Khan definitely has more bargaining power to push a better deal with Sky. Even, Khan-Brook, I think they have more advantages now to pursue a better deal.

Groves isnt a PPV fighter, but might be one in the future, so too Degale, but only if they are in real, interesting world title fights.

There is no one else out there that looks like a PPV fighter. I still think Froch has exciting fights ahead of him and he will get some PPV exposure on Sky. And Sky one thing you have to hand to Sky, is that they know how to hype **** out of a fight - they will sell Froch - his style and the fights he is in, warrants PPV exposure.

 

:deal nobody should be on PPV.

 

With two channels there is no difference, because only one can show that fight, therefore they are the only one selling that product, so its the exact same situation, isn't it?

 

that's a lie. unless you own google, which you don't. and if someone was that successful and had that kind of money, and still spent their free time on the internet sucking khan's grundle then they must be an absolute ****. so which are you - a bullshitter or a ****? you decide :good

 

Yes clearly Im ******ed!

What Im saying is whilst there is only 1 operator they can charge as much as they like. There are more way's of increasing revenue than making the PPV more expensive.

Seems like we got a bunch of experts on here, Im certainly not an expert just giving my opinion.

 

No, my TV is top of the range. Your eyesight must be impaired, preventing you from noticing the clearly substandard picture quality offered by primetime. I suggest you get your eyes tested. Or stop being such a huge wanker, whichever you'd prefer.