LOL you really are a thick ****. Here add one of these Anything that helps you sleep better :good:happy:hi:D:rofl
Picture for the Bute fight was substandard, the sound like someone on a mobile with a bad signal..... did it make me want to buy anything from them? No. Of course not. The fact is that Sky cannot charge whatever they like because people will not pay it now. Unless it's an absolute mega fight then it doesn't stand a chance, and they've only themselves to blame for that.
the ads on this site are served by the Google Display Network - so if you own 50% of Google you are doing well.
I hate to bring up race, but all I keep thinking is this ACE chap is an asian muslim proud Khan has "stuck it to Sky" because I'm struggling to see how this benefits me as a boxing fan that he is so proud of Khan looking to sell PPV's against jokers like McCloskey. You might be Berty Big Bollocks who is a Multi Millionaire and doesn't mind throwing £15 away each time Khan fights a Morales or McCloskey of this world, but I don't expect to pay for that muck when I'm used to seeing some decent cards put together for free. I don't mind paying for PPV's either, I just want some quality control and letting boxers make all the decisions is a monopoly too!!! Pay for Mayweather on Primtime? You must be having a laugh. Sky need to sort it out, that much we can agree on, but I can't get excited about having to pay to watch boxing on PPV channels when I'm already paying out £55 a month.
Wow, what a stupid comment. More competition leads to better quality. Sky would be reluctant to show **** cards if Primetime are showing marquee fights, it will be harder for the likes of W@reen to show such garbage on Sky You really are a brainwashed little idiot if you think that Sky having all the pie is a good idea. I suggest you stop watching so much Sky and other Murdoch media to rid yourself of this disease, who knows a little Primetime maybe the cure.
No. No, no, no. More channels means more costs! Setanta meant I lost football from my Sky subsription unless I paid MORE. If I am happy with the cost of Sky then I pay it, if not I don't. Simples! (as I like to say). There's your control. Not more PPV. And especially a product that has come to market clearly substandard.
Ever tried clicking on one of those ads to see where it takes you to one of those wonderful free trial offers. I have a great deal on some Acai berries for you, free of course. Just pay the p+p, you seem to spend alot of your time on here so I assume are a pretty fat ****. So those berries would work wonders Or maybe some teeth whitening gel, again free, as long you pay me p+p, with the time spent on here I'm assuming again you don't have much time to spend on oral hygeine.
Khan will make twice as much money with Sky then he will with Primetime. He will be back. He has a lukewarm PPV support at the best of times, so throw into that an unattractive 3am start and it does not make business sense. Not hard to see why people weren't jumping through hoops to get this fight. It will have got worse figures than Khan-McCloskey which was bolstered by Irish interest.
fail. delusion: noun - a false opinion or conception I implied that you should stop wanking in order to improve your eyesight. You then repeated the joke back to me as if you made it up. This is a fact and not a false opinion. The irony in you wrongly calling me deluded is that it actually makes you a deluded ****. Aw, you poor stupid *******. Try again.
Being Asian has nothing to do with it. Sky need to sort it out yes, but how ANYONE in their right mind thinks Primetime being on the scene is bad for boxing FANS is beyond me. This is bigger than one small fight, it is about the future of boxing in the UK. PPV fights need to be PPV fights not a couple of domestic bums put together by Sky's favourite promoter, if I'm getting the marquee fights for free I'm not paying £15 to see a couple of bums go at it, where is the sense in that