Amir Khan is better than Ricky Hatton, says Malignaggi

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by scurlaruntings, Mar 19, 2010.


  1. GazOC

    GazOC Guest Star for Team Taff Full Member

    61,460
    42
    Jan 7, 2005

    The knots some people have to tie themselves up in to have a pop at fighters they don't like!!;)
     
  2. snakeface

    snakeface The Woodside Hurricane Full Member

    7,313
    0
    Feb 18, 2010
    these fights just don't happen soon enough to quiet some.
     
  3. kosaros

    kosaros Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    26,593
    5
    Jul 21, 2008
    :lol::good
     
  4. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล

    82,426
    1,478
    Sep 7, 2008
    I'm rooting for Paulie big time.

    Khans a bigger nobhead than him.
     
  5. homebrand

    homebrand Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,674
    3
    Jan 1, 2009
    he better hope Khan isn't better than Hatton because if he is Paulie will be beaten so badly he'll be begging his corner to stop the fight after 4 rounds.
     
  6. scurlaruntings

    scurlaruntings ESB 2002 Club Full Member

    35,621
    12
    Jul 19, 2004
    Is that you Mandelson? :think Really really shitty interpretation of what i said. :roll:
     
  7. scurlaruntings

    scurlaruntings ESB 2002 Club Full Member

    35,621
    12
    Jul 19, 2004
    Are you the moral conscience of ESB? Because thats just pure rubbish. Knots? Give me a break. I call a spade a spade. You dont like it too bad. But please do not add your own "spin" on what iv said in a poor attempt at jest.
     
  8. achillesthegreat

    achillesthegreat FORTUNE FAVOURS THE BRAVE Full Member

    37,070
    29
    Jul 21, 2004
    Paulie talked alot of **** about Hatton and got done over. He calls it an off night. That is a great excuse. He has good speed but overrated, his technique is terrible, his power poo, limited one style amongst other things.
     
  9. skel1983

    skel1983 Guest

    The deep end?? The deep end would be fighting Bradely not feather fisted Paulie.
     
  10. carrotcruncher

    carrotcruncher Member Full Member

    488
    0
    Oct 15, 2008
    The question of the thread is ludicrous. Khan has talent, and masses of it. But no chin. That is the truth and will be throughout his career. Paulie doesn't break eggshells, so the ideal opponent. And if a shot Hatton could do a number on him....... A prime Hatton would have ko'd Khan.
     
  11. achillesthegreat

    achillesthegreat FORTUNE FAVOURS THE BRAVE Full Member

    37,070
    29
    Jul 21, 2004
    Khan has height, reach and speed to kill. Hatton was strong, agile and powerful. Both had horrible technique. Hatton never really improved. Khan has come on leaps and bounds.

    Boxing is about intelligence but the talent must be nurtured. Hatton used his talent to cheat. He had a good beard so he had no defence. He was a strong fight so he mauled. He was agile so he jumped around. Khan also used his talent to cheat but when he came up stuck he made a decision to improve.

    I'm not sure if Khan can rival what Hatton did, I'm not sure he has the intangiables but technically he's giving it a better go in my opinion.
     
  12. onourway

    onourway Haye KTFO1 Wlad Full Member

    5,774
    3
    Mar 31, 2008
    :rofl:rofl
     
  13. GazOC

    GazOC Guest Star for Team Taff Full Member

    61,460
    42
    Jan 7, 2005
    I think it was a pretty spot on interpretation of what you said. You said Paulie was **** and then praised Kahn for fighting him.

    Its not rocket science!!:lol:
     
  14. GazOC

    GazOC Guest Star for Team Taff Full Member

    61,460
    42
    Jan 7, 2005
    Face it Scurla, that post was a complete **** up on your part. Take it on the chin and move on.:p
     
  15. HitmanHatton

    HitmanHatton Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,485
    5
    Sep 17, 2009
    Its clear he doesnt like Hatton or Khan and hes just trying to manipulate his post so that hes having a go at both of them at the same time, well trying to.

    It's a major **** up and he doesnt even want to admit it.