Amir Khan/Paulie Malignaggi To Be On ITV!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Lazarus, Apr 15, 2010.


  1. Lazarus

    Lazarus Realist Full Member

    29,937
    1
    Jan 1, 2010
  2. Trendkiller

    Trendkiller 420 Full Member

    684
    0
    Apr 20, 2008
  3. Lazarus

    Lazarus Realist Full Member

    29,937
    1
    Jan 1, 2010
  4. gungfu

    gungfu Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,658
    6
    Apr 27, 2009


    Thank ITV, dumbass.
     
  5. Arran

    Arran Boxing Junkie banned

    9,773
    3
    Jan 21, 2008
    what? the **** makes us pay to watch him fight bums like Salita, why should I thank him.
     
  6. NoHomeJerome

    NoHomeJerome Boxing Junkie banned

    8,229
    0
    Feb 14, 2010
    you absolute weapon. Khan is selling to the highest bidder, bottom line.
    yeah he really cared when he fought cans like oisin ***an and salita on PPV. he also conned the public getting sparked after 60 seconds for £15.
     
  7. hagman1989

    hagman1989 the boxing site , try it Full Member

    8,284
    1
    Dec 13, 2008

    the ***an fight happened to be on ppv but he was an undercard attraction , if you remember it was the uk leg of the oscar - manny fight so no shame there

    and the salita one was his mando and while i agree it shouldnt be on ppv if thats the most option for him then so be it
     
  8. Uncle Rico

    Uncle Rico Loyal Member Full Member

    39,748
    3
    Jun 28, 2009
    Whoa! Didn't see this coming, I honestly though SkySports would take this up.

    Guess it's great news for British boxing fans. Maybe this will help retrieve those fans he lost when signed to Sky Box Office.
     
  9. Wordup

    Wordup Big Stiff Idiot Full Member

    1,644
    2
    Oct 20, 2008
    You're right, naughty white racists!

    It's not like I've ever been called a white ******* by blacks or aisans:patsch
     
  10. haglerwon

    haglerwon Official GTMSBT Marquez Full Member

    218
    0
    May 1, 2009
    Nice one, ITV.

    Almost makes up for seven hundred years of Emmerdale.
     
  11. Uncle Rico

    Uncle Rico Loyal Member Full Member

    39,748
    3
    Jun 28, 2009
    Considering where you live, that's definately believable :lol:
     
  12. Lazarus

    Lazarus Realist Full Member

    29,937
    1
    Jan 1, 2010
    Khan got caught and lost. You're saying he did that on purpose to 'con' you out of your money? You must be ******ed:patsch

    Oisin ***an fight was part of an undercard fight. So it was NOT DOWN to Khan. And if you couldn't predict the Salita fight then you're a ****ing ****** and to top it off, it wasn't like it was his fault, it was his MANDATORY. Everyone knew Khan was going to win. If you didn't like it then why did you pay for it? :patsch

    And to top it off, Khan was with Frank Warren. Now he isn't. Khan doesn't care about his ***** money. The guy wanted it to be on terrestrial TV. Fine, don't give Khan credit, but in the end YOU PAID for his fights. You should have known they're hand picked and made for Khan to win. You shouldn't ***** about the predictable.

    And next time mate, DON'T PAY to see Khan. I think he rather prefer not to take your money.
     
  13. liger05

    liger05 puroresu fan 4 life!! Full Member

    4,101
    21
    Nov 11, 2008
    lol. I think its more to do with the fact that Sky were not going to pay him what he wanted. Khan is not a PPV star. His PPV sales have been weak.
     
  14. Trendkiller

    Trendkiller 420 Full Member

    684
    0
    Apr 20, 2008
    we should thank him for makin us pay £15 for prescott, £15 for salita, £15 for Barrera, a total of £45 for, what? 8/9 rounds of ****? **** him! I am never paying to watch the little ***** again.
     
  15. liger05

    liger05 puroresu fan 4 life!! Full Member

    4,101
    21
    Nov 11, 2008
    The idea that Khan has made a decision not to do PPV because he cares about reaching a wider audience is laughable.

    If Khan was making money from PPV he would still be fighting on PPV but his PPV fights have all flopped in buy rates.