Amir Khan PPV numbers

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by marcelo86, Jan 21, 2010.


  1. Brickhaus

    Brickhaus Packs the house Full Member

    22,296
    5
    Mar 14, 2007
    Why exactly are you staring at his genitals?

    This is funny stuff though. He's just pulling everyone's chain.
     
  2. h13vyy

    h13vyy Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,689
    0
    Nov 12, 2008
    I ain't it denial. Khan killed himself to make the lightweight division which didn't help his chin. It's been stated by lots of people that killing yourself to make a weight affect your chin. Also, when Khan fought prescott, his whole conditioning method was messed up. He used to build muscle and was huge from his top half but had skinny chicken legs. On top of that, his defence was poor to.

    Since he's been a LWW and under freddie roach, there been much improvement. He got caught flush more than once against Kotelnik and took them no problem. I know kotelnik ain't a puncher, but he still took them. So im not in denial, i just use my brain, something which you obviously don't do.
     
  3. Lazarus

    Lazarus Realist Full Member

    29,937
    1
    Jan 1, 2010

    LOL. You're the biggest waste on this forum. Go suck Carl froch's d***

    -Don't bother replying to this ***.
     
  4. h13vyy

    h13vyy Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,689
    0
    Nov 12, 2008
    Yes and you also think unless a fighter beats Floyd, thy don't deserve credit for anything else they do, you also believe by the time a fighter reaches the age of 22 he must have fought someone of Floyds calibre. You also believe Khan has no talent what so ever and how he's reached 22-1-0 defies all logic. So what credibility do your opinions/posts really have from now on?
     
  5. Geoffers

    Geoffers Active Member Full Member

    991
    15
    Feb 2, 2008
    I don't understand the logic that says that unless someone beats the best there is they are talentless. It is not a logial premise. If you can't beat the best then you have less talent than the best, that's all. You could be second best, third best. Hell, you might even be a third rate belt-holder who profits from good matchmaking. But talentless? Bull****.

    I would fully expect Khan to lose to Floyd if they ever fought. Khan's speed would give Mayweather a few problems but ultimately Floyd would figure him out and either stop Khan late or use his brilliant defence to nullify Khan's flurries to get a UD.

    So Khan loses to Floyd and I doubt anyone disagrees with that. However, I think Khan has sufficient talent to make a fight of it and he would not be disgraced to be in the same ring as Floyd Mayweather.

    Interview technique has nothing to do with boxing ability. I have no source for evidence to back this up but it's still absolute fact. Moses wrote it on the back of the ten commandments so it's got to be true.

    D33Pwaters... your logic is flawed, your hate is obvious and your mental age is single digits.
     
  6. h13vyy

    h13vyy Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,689
    0
    Nov 12, 2008
    ok ok obviously your not going to admit that your an uneducated fool. Therefore everything you have said is correct and everybody else who posted including myself are wrong. Khan will never be a Floyd and that is very embarassing.
     
  7. mugen82

    mugen82 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,483
    0
    May 1, 2009
    You've said that already, be original son, you get no marks for being a parrot.

    And also get out more, you obviously pay way too much attention to Amir and certain parts of his anatomy, noticing his "tensed up private parts" is seriously disturbing. Are you sure you're on the right forum?
     
  8. lfc18titles

    lfc18titles Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,988
    0
    Dec 11, 2009
    :lol::lol:

    cant believe the guy focusses on his ****, i bet you his bedroom is filled with amir khan pictures
     
  9. mugen82

    mugen82 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,483
    0
    May 1, 2009
    Lets not even get into the Amir Khan blow up doll he has, or the Union jack boxer shorts Khan auctioned off for his charity work.

    But this guy is seriously pathetic, all I can say is I hope to god he's a troll
     
  10. h13vyy

    h13vyy Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,689
    0
    Nov 12, 2008
    LOL this guy is hilarious though. He's so oblivious to posts that fully expose him so he retaliates by repeating his initial post. You got to LOL at "compare the tapes" i knew he's been locked up in his room. Dude it's 2010, tape days have dissapeared. It's all online these days.
     
  11. h13vyy

    h13vyy Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,689
    0
    Nov 12, 2008
    Yes and Kotelnik is talented
     
  12. h13vyy

    h13vyy Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,689
    0
    Nov 12, 2008
    Just because Kotelnik is not the best fighter in the world, don't mean he ain't talented. You you need that spelling out to you?
     
  13. h13vyy

    h13vyy Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,689
    0
    Nov 12, 2008
    Yeh iv seen that "tape". Khan was not world champion at the time so are you suprised? Im sure he's heard of him since he signed for golden boy :lol:
     
  14. h13vyy

    h13vyy Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,689
    0
    Nov 12, 2008
    no it was when he realised Khan didn't look into the interviewers eyes and when his **** was tensed up :lol:
     
  15. h13vyy

    h13vyy Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,689
    0
    Nov 12, 2008
    do you enjoy repeating yourself?