Amir Khan , " Prescott has slipped off the radar "

No clue?

You're the one questioning my knowledge on Boxing. You should be explaining if anything. I'd be happy to discuss any Boxing subject which is un-related to Khan.

You probably only notice my posts on Khan because you expect it on Khan Threads, whereas you wouldn't notice if I wrote on a different fighter topics. It happens.

 

Khan's right...rather than the victory being a springboard to greater success, Prescott seems to have in turn taken the wrong lesson from it and has ignored any boxing skills in favour of a "I can take anyone out with my punches" approach.

 

It's good for news, generally news breaks their first before most other places. It has the video trading block which is great for hunting down old fights and the"Boxing History" forum has some good discussion on. But "Non Stop Boxing" has gone to shít. People chat shít on here, I've seen it but there, it's like a school yard, you can't disagree with someone without being subjected to some petty jibe or insult.

Not only that, 9/10 threads are about Pacquaio and Mayweather. I get the feeling that a lot of users on there are Pacquaio/Mayweather fans first and boxing fans second and that some users simply go on there to talk about Pacquiao and Mayweather in some WWE type rivalry fashion.

It's a bit of a shame because I've been a member for 3 years, made a fair few posts and it used to be a decent forum, it has always had its idiots but overall there was a lot of good discussion going on, but this past year and half it's really flown off the handle, there's little moderation and no quality control with regards to discussions. It's just a free for all full of fanboys, pre-pubescent kids and wannabe gangsters.

I pretty much go on there for news and videos these days.

 

Regardless of your posts on other subjects, I have yet to see something with any real substance.

 

Looks like Flea is on the rampage

He is like some ESB dictator anybody who doesn't make it to Flea's required standard of boxing knowledge is taken outside and shot. Or at the very least electronically molested

Its certainly an interesting method of getting votes for 2011 poster of the year .....

 

Real substance? So how do you plan on doing that?

If you do, I suggest you watch every one of my posts from now on to see if there is any 'real substance' to them.

Really, it's pathetic when you try to question my knowledge when you clearly don't know what's written in every one of my posts.

It's just makes you look silly. I've been in Boxing for 3 years or so and believe I've actually grasped the Knowledge on the Sport pretty well as of now. I couldn't care less if I get something wrong.

I've always admitted to it, whether it be to a hater, or someone else, I'm always willing to learn.

You saying that I know F' all about the Sport says a lot about Arrogant people like yourself who suddenly believe they are the Scholars of Boxing and believe they have the right to question someone on their Boxing Knowledge.

 

Yep. I've got to be careful. I mean, I've only been in the Sport for a while. I better take a book out and start learning before Mr Flea comes back and puts me on blast.

 

I've decided inwill never win so am goin' on one again :good

Lazarus, I'm sure you and I will debate down the line. And yes u an a pretentious 'scholar', hence why I don't rate Khan as highly as you do....or his 'amazing jab' :good

 

Fair play to 'i'm willing to learn'

Maybe I was wrong to judge you.

 

Didn't you see his jab against the modern day Willie Pep, Malignaggi?

 

We all know great defensively Paulie 'feather fisted punch bag' Malignaggi was mate :deal

 

For me Prescott would still be a viable opponent as it was such a bad loss.

It would sell much better than McCloskey and that is a fact before the contingent start nailing me to the wall!!!

 

....

 

Bit of a let down really, eh?