Amir Khan rushed to hospital

Heard almost the same thing; there was a flurry of dust particles whirling in the heavy winds and one particle landed directly on the sweet spot. Bad luck but not much you can do.

Here's to a speedy recovery, Amir.

 

Wake up.

 

Maybe he is getting adamantium in his jaw, just like wolverine :shock:

 

What happens if someone slanders or libels someone who is dead?

While it may be reprehensible to make false and defamatory statements about someone who has died, in most states there is no recovery for libel or slander of someone who is deceased.

The historical reason for allowing claims for slander and libel is to protect the person's reputation and thus his or her ability to earn a living and enjoy the benefits of good standing in the community. Once the person is dead, those concerns go away. In some states, even if the person who was defamed sued for libel or slander and died before the case went to judgment, the action would be dismissed.

True, there is the possibility of damage to the reputation of the deceased, and that could harm the estate of the deceased. For example, if someone defames an author who died, that author's works may not sell as well in the future and thus the royalties the estate stands to earn would be reduced.

Some states do permit suits for libel or slander to be brought on behalf of the estate of a deceased person in some circumstances. The definition of libel in Texas includes written words that "tend to blacken the memory of the dead." In Rhode Island there is a right of action if the deceased person was slandered or libelled in an obituary in any newspaper or on any radio or television station within three (3) months of his or her date of death. Many states, including California, will allow personal injury suits (libel and slander are considered personal injuries) filed by a living plaintiff to continue on and be passed to the plaintiff's successor in interest or personal representative upon the plaintiff's death. The plaintiff's estate may then recover if the lawsuit is successful.




hope that helps.

 

. Please don't give that saddened bull****. You'd hate Khan even if he did nothing wrong.

And here's you getting exposed by Cobbler http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=236232&page=4

You need to chill with your posting. Over 3000 in less than 6 months. Holy ****. Is ESB your life or what?

 

Khan is a warrior, **** like this dont effect him. :bart

 

I got a prediction wrong. Hardly exposed. I said Khan would win.

You just got exposed shamelessly accusing a poor woman of being a gold-digger just to save face for your hero, only to retract it 5 minutes later when you realized you were totally wrong.

 

:rofl. **** off with that ****. You just accuse me of being exposed when it was a mistake. How is that being exposed? Define the meaning .

And as I sad. It was a mistake. It was a fine for a previous conviction. Yours was exposed. And prediction? **** off. Cobbler counteracted and you tried to **** on it saying that you actually looked through my posts.

 

Umm, getting caught getting a prediction slightly wrong (I still said Khan would win) is comparable with getting caught accusing a poor recently widowed woman of being a gold-digger and then being proven totally wrong?

:---( You're scum.

 

Mine was a mistake. You said that you never said. I don't care whether you said Khan would win or not. You still claimed you never said it and he brang it up and you didn't have **** to say. That's what called being exposed.

:----( You're a *** :good.

 

:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl

 

I was thinking the same thing bro! It's odd that Khan and Pacquiao has been hospitalized since there last fights. Could be side effects from the special shakes or withdrawls from not using them in between fights. This is something to keep an eye on forreal!!!

 

so if chavez jr. follows suit then its confirmed huh????

 

:good

 

He got one of those Pac "cramps" from Alex Ariza's "special blends....lmao...j/k. I couldn't help it.