Because both Khan and Hatton had chin problems . But 1 fighter was superior than the other . That's Khan .
Yet Hatton can actually claim to have only lost to the top 2 P4P fighters in his prime and actually being the top dog in his division. Something Khan cannot. How many times has he been dropped now?
Paulie Malignaggi and Marcos Maidana would tell you differently . I would take their word over anyone else in here .
How is he superior? Hatton was the man of the division, Khan wasn't even top 3. Question has Hatton ever been dropped off a fighter of Limmonds calibre? You know a feather fisted British level opponent?
dropped off mc gee in round one and the ref sure helped him out in round two sorry , I aint got much between mc gee and limond if anything limond is still going though and I agree no way is khan superior to wicky no way
True but Magee was classed as some sort of puncher at the time albeit European level. I was a Magee fan thought a my Christmas's had come at once in them first 2 rounds.
you was not on your own pal and yeah magee does hit harder than limond for sure yeah them two rounds wicky really learnt abit from them imo
Bigger size Longer reach Better boxing ability Better timing Better range control Better footwork Definitely faster hand speed Olympic silver medalist Amir Khan is way more superior compared to Ricky Hatton and its not even close.
I cant believe after all these years there are still ppl left trying to make Hatton one of the greatest of all time. The reason one even rates Hatton highly because we all know he was never that good to begin with.
Lmao, just cuz you make another delusional statement to justify your 30 delusional posts, doesn't make it fact. No one thinks Hatton is anything great, except if you count hitting the turnbuckle and getting knocked the **** out, then yea he is ATG at that.