An "0" or top fights

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Drofrah, Aug 29, 2008.


  1. Drofrah

    Drofrah Active Member Full Member

    813
    0
    Aug 6, 2007
    It seems quite sad to me that fighters are cultivating careers based on being unbeaten rather than taking the top fights, i for one would prefer to see a fighter take all the top contenders and lose a few times.

    It also would mean that anytime a fighter lost it wouldnt be because they were a "hype job" or "exposed", but rather that they are taking the best fights out there
     
  2. mexican legend

    mexican legend MVP! Full Member

    17,356
    1
    Jul 19, 2008
    I agree, GO fighters with balls.
     
  3. MrMagic

    MrMagic Loyal Member Full Member

    39,534
    71
    Oct 28, 2004
    Floyd Mayweather on Bernard Hopkins #1 spot a few years ago:

    "Who is undefeated!?.."
     
  4. 1Kolijn

    1Kolijn Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,514
    0
    Dec 7, 2007
    Top fights.. !!
     
  5. FlatNose

    FlatNose Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,800
    23
    Feb 16, 2006
    Being "undefeated' doesn't mean as much as it once did. Sugar Ray Robinson was once 40-0 before he lost to LaMotta but had already beaten 4 different former or future champs. Willie Pep was 62-0 , and was already Featherweight champ before he finally lost. Now the "undefeated" are guys like Tye Fields, who pull guys off of barstools to fatten up their records.
     
  6. mrplow182

    mrplow182 Seasoned Veteran Full Member

    3,391
    0
    Nov 3, 2007
    So does that mean Tommy Morrison is better than Rocky Marciano???
     
  7. Drofrah

    Drofrah Active Member Full Member

    813
    0
    Aug 6, 2007
    I just think a loss doesnt really affect anything with regards to legacy. And if a fighter can fight all comers and still keep a "0" than it is truely atg status
     
  8. r_9-Ronaldo

    r_9-Ronaldo Shinny Shadez Full Member

    1,569
    0
    Jul 27, 2008
    lmao sven ottke is undefeated and is basically doin what calzaghe did, hold on to a title for a decade, beat a bunch of bums, than start fighting old washed up elite fighters when your about to retire so can still have a moral victory with your fans if you lose
     
  9. mrplow182

    mrplow182 Seasoned Veteran Full Member

    3,391
    0
    Nov 3, 2007
    There arent that many bums on Calzaghe's list of defences....sure there are a few average fighters that were a gimme but he faced a lot of tough guys who wanted that belt from him badly
     
  10. catasyou

    catasyou Lucian Bute Full Member

    38,466
    21
    Apr 7, 2008
    For real,Chad Dawson man up!
     
  11. mrplow182

    mrplow182 Seasoned Veteran Full Member

    3,391
    0
    Nov 3, 2007
    You really want that Diaconu-Dawson matchup dont you!
     
  12. MrMagic

    MrMagic Loyal Member Full Member

    39,534
    71
    Oct 28, 2004
    I lost some of the respect I had for CD.
    If he ducks Diaconu after his Tarver bout (I think Tarver's done.. shot enough for CD to win a comfortable decision) I will officially jump off his bandwagon.

    Adrian Diaconu is VASTLY overrated though, and I still think Chad would teach him a lesson.
     
  13. catasyou

    catasyou Lucian Bute Full Member

    38,466
    21
    Apr 7, 2008
    Yeah man offcourse,even if Diaconu losses,just wanna see the fight.
     
  14. r_9-Ronaldo

    r_9-Ronaldo Shinny Shadez Full Member

    1,569
    0
    Jul 27, 2008
    i want to see dawson - calzaghe or dawson hopkins to see if he really is world class or just a stepping stone because those guys will sperate the elite frm the rest
     
  15. mrplow182

    mrplow182 Seasoned Veteran Full Member

    3,391
    0
    Nov 3, 2007
    Diaconu needs to work on stamina and late rounds workrate, if he does that he'll do well against Dawson