An Open Letter to Joe Calzaghe

I'm not going to search so I'll take your word for it..........I guess.:blood

 

Not really, the fight wasnt as close as many people think...I had Joe by an easy 4 or 5 points without question.... Hopkins trying to ruin the fight didnt do **** for him and in all honesty was about as close as Dawson-Tarver....wide, very wide

 

Please do, I crave your approval.

 

No such thing as a wide SD.

 

Dawson has been a champion for what, about 18 months or something?

Calzaghe: over 11 years?

Considering the time-frame, Dawson's resume shames him.

 

Then I'm pretty sure you're going to be disappointed one way or the other.

 

I was referring to the Hopkins v Tarver fight.

A bit of a problem for your claim that a victory over Tarver is as impressive as a victory over Hopkins.

 

Take into consideration that Dawson is only 27....now where are we?....at the same place we were before....

 

No we're not, you are arguing Dawsons resume is as good as Calzaghes. What has happened now is that you have been proven to be wrong.

But as you state Dawson is only 27 and he could become a dominant power, but to claim he's as good as Calzaghe resume wise is wrong. At this stage anyway, but you can however, keep looking through those rose tinted spectacles you have on, if you so wish.

 

PS. Thanks for embarrassing Bernard, we all hate his racist ass!:good

 

You said "Dawson has done as much as Calzaghe despite his short resume."

Age, number of fights etc don't come into it.