Analysis of Klitschko defeats

Yeah... Sanders did beat the hell out of Wlad. Who ever said that he didn't? The point that I made in my very first post was that luckily, Wlad has achieved enough success that he isn't defined by his losses. I should have clarified that by saying... of course, except for the haters.

People act like I am a Lewis hater, just because I talk objectively about his career. However, they never see me harping over his losses... and they NEVER see me claiming that he has a glass chin. That's because I feel that Lewis was better than he showed in his losses, and he pushed on successfully in his career after them... and I don't believe that just because a fighter gets knocked out, that he has a glass chin. Which is why I can say that Wlad is also better than he showed in his losses, and has pushed on successfully with his career after them. I also don't believe that he has a glass chin, just because he has been knocked down or stopped.

 

Personally I don't think it matters whether Klitschko went down from a headbutt or a punch, the fact is he got up again, disproving the stupid theories about his glass jaw. All the great champions have hit the deck, but in their prime they get up and survive. Klitschko didn't survive and that tells you nothing about his jaw but everything about his heart.

 

haha i dont mind people making fun of their loses, especially wladimir's. and the reason is i will have the last laugh when his remaining opponents are ko'ed before he decides to retire.

because i truly feel it was more a case of wladimir beating himself rather than the opponent. if wladimir fought a war and his will was broken before a ko loss then fair enough. if wladimir was ko'ed and did the chicken dance by an average punching heavy then yes, fair enough.

but in all 3 loses i felt he simply did not prepare right and paid the price. and because of that i dont see him losing before he retires simply because he knows to be careful of powerful counterpunchers (sanders) and blowing his load and falling over from exhustion or anxiety (brewster/purrity).

and yet to satisfy their bias minds, haters will simply believe his chin is made of china and his stamina non-existant. and they will continue to jump for joy when the infrequent punch lands on his beard only for it to have no effect. afterall no matter what you think of sanders, he had a nasty punch and was kinda like the zab judah of the heavyweights in that he only had a few dangerous rounds before gassing. if wladimir's chin is as bad as they say, then why didn't peter ko him? afterall peter knocked a couple opponents out cold. why didn't ANY other opponent ko him?

instead wladimr gassed against two other opponents and suddenly his chin is ****?

anyway i am looking forward to the david haye wladimir klitschko fight. that will be depressing for the anti-klitschko crowd that's for sure

 

Combination my ass. The head clash had nowhere near the impact of that left hand. The cut was around Wladimir's left eye. The first clash was on his right side. The second headclash after Sanders followed up with another left seemed to cause the cut.

This content is protected

 

Jesus Christ. That's what I said. Read the whole ****ing sentence.

 

The second head clash was the one that I was talking about.

 

Yeah I believe you...:smooch.

 

Wlad didn't get back up? He actually got up after every single knockdown. Every great champion hit the deck, but got up to survive every time? Wlad has actually hit the deck, and got up to win the fight. Did Lennox Lewis always get up and survive? Do you consider Lewis a great Champion? Didn't George Foreman... who you keep bringing up... get knocked down and not survive? Do you consider him a great Champion? Do you consider Joe Frazier a great Champion? Do you consider Mike Tyson and Evander Holyfield to be great Champions? Jack Dempsey? Does he lack heart... or was he not a great Champion? I could go on forever, couldn't I?

So.. according to your logic, all of those Champions that I mentioned are lacking heart? Or are you saying that they just aren't great Champions?

 

Are you being a smart ass... or just slow? Nobody is referring to the first little clash of heads. We are talking about the nasty clash of heads directly before Wlad drops that landed on his left eye/temple region. Which is why I pointed out that his left eye was cut. Pretty simple, isn't it? Sanders was also landing a left hand on the other side as well... which lead to a pretty nasty combination of Sanders' left, and head.

 

Damn, I guess if you're a good golpher, you can't be a good boxer.

On a side note: Vitali has never been down. Vitali was winning both fights on the cards at the time both injuries resulted in the fights ending. It gets exhausting explaining this to you hate whitey/PC/far left fruits.

 

my thoughts exactly

 

Make your mind up. You first said;

Either;

A. You're lying & were refering to the 1st clash of heads, which couldn't have caused the cut.

or

B. You really were refering to the 2nd clash of heads, which only came after the follow up left....before which Wladimir was already in noddyland

The second clash was no harder than the first anyway. They were both weak. It was the initial left hand only which knocked Wladimir silly.

 

Ok, so you're just slow. Got it.:good Make my mind up? Are you really going to act like I can't make up my mind just because you are weak in reading comprehension skills? I have been saying the same damn thing all along... for some reason... you are the ONLY person who doesn't understand.

If you notice, Wlad was NOT going to go down from the first left, before the first "clash of heads"... which nobody was even talking about. The real knockdown shot came as they clinched AFTER the first sequence, and Sanders landed that left inside, and also sent Wlad's head smashing into Sanders' head which was bearing down, and moving forward. If you think that the clash of heads wasn't hard, I would advise you to actually look at the impact, along with the resulting cut on Wlad's left eye. You can tell that the sequence that I am talking about did the real damage, as Wlad was still bringing his left arm up around behind Sanders with life still in his body... after the sequence that everyone besides you is referring to... Wlad fell limp to the canvas.

Wlad was buzzed from SEVERAL shots before that happened. Nobody is on here acting like Wlad lost because of that clash of heads, silly ass... we are just pointing out something that clearly happened... and certainly didn't help matters.

 

Oh please...he was gone already. Denial is a terrible thing.

Edit: Regarding your post edit...I'm the only one bothering to reply to you. Don't pretend like your first post was clear. My reading comprehension is fine. If you're really not changing your p.o.v. & lying, try and explain yourself better.

 

Wow... I thought that anyone with at least a 1st grade education would understand that I would be talking about the nasty headbutt on the LEFT EYE.. not the minor clash of heads on the right side.:nut What happened is, you actually thought that you had a good point... until you realized that you have no point. Which is why right now you are just rambling and not making any sense. Are you really that slow? Does it honestly take a lot of explaining for you to realize that it would be a headbutt on the left eye, causing the cut on the left eye?:rofl

I don't know exactly how many times I have to say that I am NOT saying that is why Wlad lost to Sanders. Wlad lost to Sanders because Sanders is an extremely dangerous puncher, and obviously Wlad and his team didn't do their homework and properly prepare for this fight. Sanders hurt Wlad, Wlad had no idea what to do... and Sanders wouldn't stop punching him in the face. Fight over. However, none of that disproves what I have been trying to explain to you in very simple terms... THE HEADBUTT ON WLAD'S LEFT EYE CAUSED THE CUT ON WLAD'S LEFT EYE. Wlad had already lost control of that fight before it happened... I never said otherwise. So... you can stop any time with acting like I said that is why Wlad lost.