And the referees for Pascal-Hopkins will be...

Safe to say Pascal via split decision?

 

The belgium judge is corrupted.

The ref is alright but nothing special.

Claude Paquette hasn't been scored anything controversial in a while.

 

It will be a clear UD for Pascal anyway!

 

Hopkins is going to shut this mother****er down. :deal

 

Hopkins' workrate is so poor that he's going to have trouble racking up rounds. There's no doubt that Hopkins is light years ahead of Pascal skillwise. If one thing is for sure, this is going to points.

Tough one to call this but I'm going to favour a hometown decision. Hopkins will be the better boxer but the hometown crowd will sway the judges.

 

Paquette has scored 33% of Pascal's pro career, just twice since 2007 but that doesn't favor B-HOP much.

 

Oki the belgian is kind of corrupt or a hometown ref, we got a ref and judge from quebec.
Take that in mind alongside with hopkins' low workrate, pascals speed and style and hopkins performance vs jones. I would say Pascal to win is a very safe bet(even ud is safe) Place your bets gentlemen. Besides money im going to place im willing to place a avatar bet against someone who thinks hopkins wins this.
I would love to see him pull it off but i believe his tank is empty.

 

Pass.I will be at a Christmas party instead.**** Hopkins and his money grabbing ways.

 

For Hopkins to win 7 rounds in Quebec with his low work rate and tendency to gas... I tend to agree with you.

But Hopkins is so crafty, could he have something up his sleeve?

 

To me it means, even though he scored Pascal when he was at the beggining it still means because he is accostumed to see him(never seen B-HOP), now that he will see a different Pascal from the one he saw when he became "accostumed" he will see something different, which may benefit Pascal on his card.

 

doubtful