If Lutter was dumb enough to fall for it and go for a "lazy armbar", than that's his own fault. What would've made him tired? Honestly, unless he's just a plain ***** ***** who sucks at life? What other reasons? If he was so easily dominating, then what would've made him tired? he didn't even make weight, therefore he didn't cut as much as he should have. He looked quite good in that fight, it's the fact that he got his ass subbed that allows you guys to come up with the "gassed" excuse, even though he showed no signs of it during the fight. You're not fat,. There, I made something up. The source was in the fight, what else do you need? I know this from arguing on Sherdog all that time ago when I gave a **** about MMA aside from a few fighters. This question was one of the most asked in grappling forums there, and one of the most answered by grappling afficianados. If I was bullshitting, I'd have been the only one who heard of it. Apparently I'm not.
No one is arguing that. Except that lazy bar was cause by him being exhausted. Just for your information when you've just cut 20lbs 1day before, your BRAIN will be dehydrated. It's simply impossible to regain all of that in pretty much 24hours. You will be gassed out fast. I'm sure you're not familiar with it but either take my word for it or go read an article by someone you would trust. No signs? ROFL. Read above for information. No signs :rofl:rofl, what fight were you watching? :|:|:|:| You've devestated my self esteem. I'm gona go cut my wrists. Source is the fight? Ahaahah. Good one. That's great, couldn't find anything better huh? Fight is the source of the new technique guys! If you're mounted stick your arms out as a decoy :rofl:rofl It's BJJ 101 lol. I'm gona get a kick out of it when I'm gona "show this move with a serious face" to trainers.
Tell me where in the fight he says it. Does Rogan say what you have quoted right after he attempts the move? Is it after the round? After the fight? Search for it online or something. I'm not bothering to upload the fight to try and prove your BS wrong.
All he says is something like "Oh my what a terrible attempt at an armbar by lutter. He's armbar's are usually crisp. He must be kicking himself right now. Such a bad attempt by such a good fighter. It's vendicative of how much of a bad state he's in right now." Again, Rogan actually knows what he's talking about. He wouldn't say crap like chimba, sorry. Goldberg maybe said it AFTER the fight? It might be Sweet Pea who you're quoting.
Regardless of whatever you're saying, there were no signs DURING the fight. Lutter was by no means less than his normal self, and at no point did he seem out of it. Well, it seems to work on top class grapplers, so I'd give it a shot.:good
Yea, I mean, if you're looking through fishtank goggles. Couture/Rogan/Goldberg talked about Lutter being in a "weakened state" only half the fight. Though I'll admit Rogan said "Well it looks like Lutter got some water in him from yesterday and looks a little better. I mean, yesterday he looked like ghost" (paraphrased) Yea, You go ahead and try it. :good Good luck with it.
You're bullshitting. Lutter looked fine, he was just a dumbass who couldn't deal with a simple maneuver, and he payed the price. Then again, who doesn't against Anderson? All of the guys you pick over him end up with the same fate(Luttewr, Henderon, Marquardt, etc), and that fate is to get tooled.
Show me where I picked those fighters to WIN over A.Silva. Notice, this is the second time you say the same bull**** without providing any evidence. In fact I was rooting for Silva in all of those fights except maybe the one against Henderson. I like Henderson and Silva equally and it didn't matter to me who'd win. To me the fight would mean they are undisputed best MW. So, I'm bullshitting? So does, Rogan and Couture? So does pretty much 100% of experienced population that watched the fight? You said absolutely nothing new. You haven't backed your argument once with a single evidence. You're getting way too emotional and personal. I don't think I need to say more.
Anderson Silva beat Lutter DECISIVELY. Anderson Silva, after the fight, said that he LET Lutter get him to the ground because he wanted to beat Lutter on the ground. It doesn't matter if Lutter was drained. Silva is the better fighter, even if only because he takes his training seriously and Lutter doesn't. Perhaps in a rematch Lutter would be drained again.
I'd say submissively. Obviously it was decisive because it was a submission. No one is arguing that. Just like he LET Lutter mount him? I don't buy it. If Silva let Lutter take him down he is going to get beat very soon for being over confident. He was close to paying the price. Well, I think its possible that we MIGHT have seen a different outcome. We both saw Silva being mounted and pounded on. When you see Lutter go for that armbar you can see he had a face of a ghost. No doubt, in anyone's mind, Silva is the better fighter. Lutter will not get another title shot. Dana is... very upset with Lutter not making weight. I wouldn't mind seeing the fight again but I doubt an outcome will change much. Listen, you gota go back and read why this argument started. Basically everything you've said I hardly disagree with (except the LETTINg Lutter get a td, which im skeptical about.) I was just astonished by those BJJ101 guys who say that Silva LURED Lutter into an armbar attempt. Then they tried their pathetic attempts at proving it as a legit technique and try to bring some "evidence" they didn't have. They also argue that he was NOT drained while all the evidence shows otherwise.
