andre dirells 7th pro fight round 3 & 4 (shocking)

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by SWAGGER, Sep 29, 2009.


  1. Two Shakes

    Two Shakes Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,927
    176
    Sep 7, 2008
    You make some very valid points,but lets not forget that in most peoples eyes results mean far more than technical ability.Taylor made Froch look silly for 5 rounds,but the record books will show he lost by TKO.
    You can have every boxing skill in the book,and can outbox and outpunch your opponent for 11 and 3/4 rounds but if the other guy knocks you out with one shot then who's the better boxer ?
    At the end of the day its about winning.:good
     
  2. Caper

    Caper How about a fair shake? banned Full Member

    10,908
    1,362
    Apr 4, 2005
    Ha we've agreed on something! Scary;)
     
  3. laffie

    laffie Montreal Full Member

    12,846
    1
    Jan 5, 2008
    i suppose that it's easier with those two fighters. ;)
     
  4. Caper

    Caper How about a fair shake? banned Full Member

    10,908
    1,362
    Apr 4, 2005
    Oh that goes without saying and ultimatley I agree whole heartly but to say Froch is of another higher class of boxer when compared to Froch is a farse. Froch's exp will also paly a huge roll...the cards are stacked against this young man and he can't dig deep and conjure up the resourceful neanderthal inside he's gonna go down hard. Some boxers are born with it others build it through battles its called fortitude. Asking Dirrell to show this amount of mental and physical fortitude maybe asking a bit to much.
     
  5. Two Shakes

    Two Shakes Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,927
    176
    Sep 7, 2008
    I agree completely.Dirrell wouldn't take this fight unless he thought he could win,but his resolve will be tested once Froch lands,then we will see whether he can back up the talk.If Dirrell beats Froch i'll be Dissapointed,but impressed.:good
     
  6. Caper

    Caper How about a fair shake? banned Full Member

    10,908
    1,362
    Apr 4, 2005
    True, true indeed. Their pretty much polar opposites.