I've shown you what appear to be facts. You have simply stated things in your own biased opinion. I'm not too interested in proving myself right, but from the outside looking in your argument lacks credibility. Not only because Dirrell lost the fight officially, but because you seem to feel your vast knowledge for judging boxing fights should put you on the list for the upcoming Mayweather/Mosley fight. This sport is full of fishy contests with crooked refs and judges, but that fight was by no means highway robbery. There are fights out there that you can argue were absolute bs ... but this is not one of them.
well up to this point he has... fought the champ and beat him fought the next most favored person in the division and beat him... if he beats ward he makes a stake for #1 @ 168 & a p4p top 10 threat
sorry for the diss but boxrec is not a good resource.... only for fighter resume's other wise its wack
I agree in that he should be undefeated, as Froch in their fight received a hometown gift decision (nevermind the hometown reffing).
Dirrell, is UNDEFEATED in my book and the minds of many. He whip Carl Froch ass the whole night, Carl froch got some homecooking in that fight.