Dirrell has shown he has the skills to beat the best fighters in the SM division but after a very negative performance against Froch, a debatable disqualification win over Abraham, pulling out of the Super Six and some poor representation while on camera, does he deserve a second chance? His tactics of running, clinching, turning his back, bending over and compaining to the referee are not the stuff you expect to see from a champion. Does Dirrell deserve a shot at Bute? What does he need to do to redeem himself? (that is if you believe he has to?)
he beat both of those dudes and you sir, LIKE ALL THE OTHER ANTI-dIRRELL TWATS, are a SORE LOSER!.. go drink some of your shitty Newcastle ale and go away...
Boxing is about a lot more than talent, Dirrell will never be anything more than wasted potential if he doesnt show he has a bit of steel beneath the polish.
Lol. Why exactly am I a sore loser? I wasn't trying to win anything. ? And why do you assume I drink (my?) Newcastle Ale? Are you a ****ing ******? Have you lost your hard on because I suggested that people might not like AD? Aaaaw. There, there. By the way, last time I looked, he lost to Froch and was horizontal when beating Abraham.
b/c you Brits need to go watch UFC. This is the sweet science, hit and not be hit. Not look, punch me right in the face until i fall over...u brits ARE sore losers, all you complain of is heart...you can't measure a freakin' heeart or something..
Huh? That doesn't make any sense. Are you drunk? If we're suggesting other sports, perhaps you might prefer athletics? The 100 metres has produced some top runners!
just a quick reminder..Froch said he would knock Dirrell out, then did the WEEBL WOBBLE ALL OVER THE RING..
Aaaah what's the matter? Are you feeling a little sore about Dirrell's loss to Carl Froch? A sore loser! Well, how about that!