Andre Dirrell: Too little too late?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Neverchair, Mar 27, 2011.


  1. bmf95b

    bmf95b Boxing Fan Full Member

    5,268
    11
    Jan 9, 2007
  2. Steenalized

    Steenalized Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,337
    1
    Sep 20, 2010
    Great contribution :good
     
  3. Snakefist

    Snakefist Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,650
    3
    Feb 20, 2007
    It's interesting how Direll is a disgrace, yet he was dominating a man who fouled him and made no apologies for it. Very classy. But Direll is the bad guy. this forum is unreal.
     
  4. Steenalized

    Steenalized Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,337
    1
    Sep 20, 2010
    Those Brits... :-(
     
  5. Goodhill

    Goodhill Iron Horse - born to lose Full Member

    3,077
    0
    Dec 28, 2009
    Dirrell is very fast, has good footwork, is very athletic and all-in-all is promising. As to Froch-fight, if Dirrell had fought like he did in rounds 11 and 12 in the earlier rounds it could have been a great fight and Dirrell could have won - Froch had real problems with Dirrell's speed.

    I have to agree a little with Jack here, before the 11 th and the 12th rounds, Dirrell didn't fight the way a challenger does in order to win the belt. Dirrell was "mousing", running around and seldomly sticking some (lightning-speed yes, but powerless) shots. Ok, this was the young man's first 12th rounder and he was in the monster-punchers homering. Still IMO the decision was fair - champ had the ring dominance most of the fight and landed most of the power-punches before the last two rounds. Not a great fight, Froch vs Kessler was way better.

    I'd like to see them facing each other again. I'd put my money on Dirrell because he probably would be underdog in betting odds and if they would continue where they left off, I'd favor Dirrell to win.

    Style makes fights and Dirrell's style is poison to Froch.
     
  6. klion22

    klion22 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,781
    360
    Aug 4, 2007
    LOL at people going overboard.

    As soon as he puts together a couple of impressive performances, people will forget about all of this. He's still young enough to put together a great career.
     
  7. Steenalized

    Steenalized Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,337
    1
    Sep 20, 2010
    Too true. ****, Froch barely scrapes by Dirrell, loses to Kessler, then beats Abraham and people here talk about him like he's the GOAT at SMW.
     
  8. iamtheman

    iamtheman Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,407
    427
    Oct 22, 2010
    Andre Dirrell is a great fighter. In the last rounds of the Froch fight he was going toe to toe with Froch and landing the better shots, he had him staggered a few times. If only he had been more aggressive from the start instead of trying to avoid Froch so much he could have won it without question. As for running against Abraham, he was outboxing him thoroughly before the controversy. It was an impressive performance before that occurred. I'd rate Dirrell number 2 at SMW if he can work on his weaknesses and show a little more courage. Based on what I see from him, I think he could give Andre Ward a close fight.
     
  9. PR BOXING

    PR BOXING Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,669
    12
    Feb 4, 2010
    hell no, he's just getting started, wait and see. he hasn't even 20 pro fights. look at Martinez, lost to margarito in his fight #17 and dirrell lost in his 18th fight, look where sergio is now
     
  10. ImElvis666

    ImElvis666 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,812
    4
    Jan 31, 2010
    I love the way you don't mention the fact that he faked a brain injury to get out of fighting a guy he had signed on to fight a long time ago. **** him and the horse he rode in on. He should be blackballed by all tv stations. Boxing doesn't need people like Dirrell and this type of behaviour should not go unpunished.
     
  11. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,106
    4,098
    Jul 19, 2004
    Dirrell ran, held, fell down on canvas, complained, etc., in the fight with Froch, which Froch won and deserved to win. Dirrell faked being knocked out in his fight with Abraham, faked an injury to get the fight in his home town, with his judges and his criminal referee Cole who called a legit knock down a slip! Then Dirrell ran away from SOB Ward, ducked out of the damned fight! Fake brain injury, etc. Give him a Valium!
     
  12. Neverchair

    Neverchair Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,318
    2
    Oct 19, 2008
    Oh shut the **** up you arrogant cumstain.

    If you notice, I had some good things to say about AD and some bad things. My post was based on the feelings and quotes that have appeared on this site and in the boxing press.

    Im purely playing devils advocate here and asking a few questions. You assume that it's completely my own opinion and that your's is obviously superior.

    Id suggest pulling you nose out of the clouds before boring the arse out of us with your self indulgent ****.
     
  13. Neverchair

    Neverchair Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,318
    2
    Oct 19, 2008
    So far there hasn't been much discussion about the injury sustained by Dirrell and the fuss it caused.

    Some people are of the opinion AD faked the whole thing. He certainly didn't do himself any favours by forgetting the name of his own family doctor and some comments from his manager on fighting purely for money not prizes, must of had them wincing afterwards.
     
  14. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,106
    4,098
    Jul 19, 2004
    Dirrell has a great acting career, best actor of the year................
     
  15. laffie

    laffie Montreal Full Member

    12,846
    1
    Jan 5, 2008
    You're right. Froch was dirty in that fight. He wasn't able to impose his fight and was very frustrated. Dirrell was running too much for nothing though.

    Both were negative. That was not a great fight to watch.