Andre "The Matrix" Dirrell vs Carl "Slobra" Froch rematch, how would it go?

Dirrell would beat Froch again just like he did the first time

 

Naw.

Boo stayed in and explained reality for us.

Kelly had everything from a hangnail, to bronchitis, to projectile vomiting to AIDS.

And so took one of the most one-sided ass-kickings in the history of the sport.



On the other hand, Kelly never fights unless he's 100 %.

I draw your attention to his postponement of the PW fight.

And when he almost recovered, but was only at 97.4 %, he postponed it again. All he would have needed was an extra week.


He should be able to stop Sergio though. (He's sure as hell not going to out-box him).

If he doesn't, not only will Kelly's career be over, but two of our more beloved posters will have to be placed on suicide watch.

 

Dirrell was petrified of Froch in the first fight and unless Froch gets severely beaten before they maybe meet again,Dirrell will still be petrified.

Same result

 

Dirrell might just edge it with his new found experience (headbutting, faking a KO, hometown refs ignoring KDs and his lowblows). Or he might collapse in a blubbering heap like he has in his last 2 fights

 

Valid point which most people seem to be overlooking.

Normally when a guy gets sparked out, the question is how does that affect him mentally and physcially in the future. Is his punch resistance lessened? Is he more gun shy?

Well, just because the KO 'didn't count' for the purposes of the result, doesn't mean that it didn't count for Dirrell - he was still knocked out (except of course for people who think he was faking - they can safely overlook it!)

 

Finally! You were starting to sound like a broken record, but I am glad to see you have opened your eyes.

Now, just retract any statement about Cool Hand Carl being slow and we have a result.

 

I think Dirrell Would win this time, by decision. I got the impression he would have won last time if he had stepped it up a bit and spent less time holding.

 

Cleverly hidden within this letter, for added incentive to read onward, is one lie. Not a lie of statistical or grammatical error but a ludicrous falsehood at once so absurd as to strike the reader as an insult to human intelligence and yet so footling as to convince the reader that MichiganWarrior throws a temper tantrum every time I suggest that pointing out that he wants to transform our society into a sleazy war machine is like pointing out that garbage attracts flies. I guess I should start by saying that I pledge—in my daily life, in my family, my work, my community, my country, and my region—to warn the public against those appalling morons whose positive accomplishments are always practically nil but whose conceit can scarcely be excelled. To top that off, he believes that his activities are on the up-and-up. Unfortunately, as long as he believes such absurdities, he will continue to commit atrocities.

MichiganWarrior wants to get me thrown in jail. He can't cite a specific statute that I've violated, but he does believe that there must be some statute. This tells me that MichiganWarrior's lamentations are characterized by a preachy arrogance unbefitting to someone who knows so little. For the benefit of any doubting Thomases I will prove that point via an explanation of how whenever anyone states the obvious—that each day, I see the world becoming more hostile as a determined MichiganWarrior carries out his backwards plans—discussion naturally progresses towards the question, "Will peeling back the onion of MichiganWarrior's callow metanarratives cause MichiganWarrior to shed tears or will it merely enhance his desire to establish tacit boundaries and ground rules for the permissible spectrum of opinion?" Well, if I knew that, I'd be in Stockholm picking up my prize and a sizable check. I hardly need to tell you that my concern and outrage are not directed solely at MichiganWarrior, but at all those who seek to spread scary views. For proof of this fact I must point out that MichiganWarrior uses the word "pseudoparenchymatous" without ever having taken the time to look it up in the dictionary. People who are too lazy to get their basic terms right should be ignored, not debated. Let me end this letter by challenging my readers to rouse people's indignation at MichiganWarrior. Are you with me, or with the forces of fetishism and oppression?

 

I've got a beef with Carl 'Sugar' Froch. For openers, Froch extricates himself from difficulty by intrigue, by chicanery, by dissimulation, by trimming, by an untruth, by an injustice. He actually believes that those of us who oppose him would rather run than fight. True, Froch has a right to his opinion. In his mind, he also apparently has a right to be an uncompromising defalcator as evidenced by his endless attempts to elevate socially inept, mingy delinquents to the sublime. I could go on and on about his special form of expansionism, but you get the general idea. Does he think his arguments through, or does he just chug along on his computer, writing about whatever trite bromides happen to suit his needs that day? I ask because his trained seals resist seeing that he can't control his desire to have everything he wants and to have it now. They resist seeing such things because to see them, to examine them, to think about them and draw conclusions from them is to work together in an atmosphere of friendship and hope. In closing, we must work together to arraign Carl 'Sugar' Froch at the tribunal of public opinion. Together, we can make a difference. Forever and always.

 

25 have tried, 1 ran around the ring falling over like a schoolgirl whose lemonade was spiked with rum, 26 have failed.

 

i dont understand how people think Froch was really hurt by Dirrel. In the 11th he wasnt hurt at all it was just the commentators bias. In the 10th he wobbled slightly, covered up and then came right back. The guy has an awesome chin, Dirrel wins a UD next time but aint stopping Carl.