Andre Ward has been usurped at 168

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Hi-Tek-Lomo, Sep 27, 2015.


  1. Hi-Tek-Lomo

    Hi-Tek-Lomo Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,901
    802
    Jul 18, 2015
    While Ward has been dancing in circles since the Froch win, 168 has become a competitive division without him. I mean, why is he fighting a bum like Paul Smith when he could've fought two British fighters in Groves and Degale? What is Ward afraid of?

    Meanwhile, Badou Jack has come back in handsome style and has dispatched two of the best @ 168 while Ward has been playing with his dink.

    Ward is no longer "the man" @ 168. That was almost four years ago, people. The Froch fight is ancient history. The div. has passed him by
     
  2. Eastpaw

    Eastpaw Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,005
    163
    Apr 12, 2015
  3. iceman71

    iceman71 WBC SILVER Champion Full Member

    51,687
    23
    Jul 28, 2008
    groves sucks.
    hes famous for losing twice to a guy that Ward dominated.
     
  4. attaboi

    attaboi Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    7,143
    12
    Feb 19, 2012
    Are you stupid or what, what part of Ward needed a tuneup after a long layoff do you not understand?
     
  5. Godlovkin

    Godlovkin Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,656
    3
    Feb 5, 2015
    Ward cant make 168 anymore

    he needs to fight in his proper division 175 next time

    last thing we need is another fighter always fighting in his custom made division, a la Cottoweight or Caneloweight
     
  6. Jake LaMotta

    Jake LaMotta Lights Out Full Member

    7,293
    1,482
    Jan 3, 2015
    Groves, Jack and Anthony Dirrell aren't even worthy of being sparring partners for Ward, let alone get in a ring with him for a proper fight. Quit fooling idiot.
     
  7. Hi-Tek-Lomo

    Hi-Tek-Lomo Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,901
    802
    Jul 18, 2015

    So Paul Smith is better than Groves? Alrighty then.
     
  8. Hi-Tek-Lomo

    Hi-Tek-Lomo Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,901
    802
    Jul 18, 2015

    Oh, btw, he's fighting another no-hoper on the Cotto-Canelo undercard, too. I guess he needs TWO tuneups, eh?
     
  9. attaboi

    attaboi Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    7,143
    12
    Feb 19, 2012
    Who's the "no-hopper" that Ward is fighting?
     
  10. iceman71

    iceman71 WBC SILVER Champion Full Member

    51,687
    23
    Jul 28, 2008
    im pretty sure groves has been busy the last 2 years losing to froch twice and jack.....when does he have time to take another loss?
     
  11. Young Terror

    Young Terror ★ Griselda ★ Full Member

    7,515
    7,342
    May 9, 2012
    Hes fighting TBA.

    Check out his record nobody has more losses than TBA.
     
  12. Hi-Tek-Lomo

    Hi-Tek-Lomo Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,901
    802
    Jul 18, 2015

    Sounds like excuses to me. So who should he be fighting @ 168 if not for those guys? Exactly.
     
  13. Hi-Tek-Lomo

    Hi-Tek-Lomo Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,901
    802
    Jul 18, 2015
    And I'm pretty sure Ward has been losing in life since the Froch fight. He's become so irrelevant that he is now relegated to fighting on somebody else's undercard.
     
  14. Maggo

    Maggo Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,069
    13
    Mar 18, 2011
    Thats what I ve said weeks ago... the Division changed much since the super six time and Ward is only calliang out a 160 champ every day and is fighting the leftover of Arthur Abraham at a catch weight over the 168 and when someone from the lightheavy calls him out he is running into his hole and stay quite for days... Andre Ward is a JOKE :deal
     
  15. Maggo

    Maggo Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,069
    13
    Mar 18, 2011
    Looks like he hasn't seen the 2 Abraham vs Smith fights hehehe