exactly its impossible to be completely objective when its about a subject your passionate about anyone who claims to be completely objective is a joke
Because if you're objective it means you're impartial and unbiased, which you are not. You are incredibly subjective, because you are incredibly partial and biased as is dodong, but at least he admits it.
Ok let me rephrase that. I'm human but I try my best to remain objective when it comes to boxing related topics, especially regarding Pac vs Mayweather beef. I may come across as biased but I try to remain objective.
to thread topic...are you disgusted on how biased ward was for lundy on the lundy-dolorme fight?? or do you think he was describing it right??
No one has a problem with you being a Pac fan, even an over-the-top one. The problem is, you let your Pac fandom interrupt your ability to accept or even acknowledge TRUTHS when they don't fit a pro-Pac agenda. And you, IMO, engage in deliberate misinformation and lies on this forum in support of your bias. Seriously, how many times have you been exposed for ignoring answers provided to you, with links and documentation, because it doesn't fit your pro-Pac agenda or position, only to then ask the same question a week or two later? That's above being just 'biased'. That's being a LIAR. This is why, IMHO, you are one of the worst type of posters on ESB. Because unlike alot of the other so-called 'pac****s' on here who spam ESB because of a combination of immaturity and Pac hero worship, you actually KNOW BETTER, but still CHOOSE to act that way. Be better than that.
is this still about the name of the known PED (except hgh as urine test hasn't been accepted by WADA though urine testing exist) you're claiming isn't detectable through urine test and post fight blood test within the 24day cut off?? if it is then post it in pac-floyd thread and i'll answer you from there. now, who are you biased for or against?? :think if you want to floyd that question, comment on ward's action last night.
That's just one example. And in that example, you decide to ignore the statements and multiple links from experts in the drug cheating (Conte) and drug testing (Caitlin) strictly because it made Pac look bad and contradicted your baseless 24-days-is-sufficient position. There are others. Be better than that.