Andre Ward or Chad Dawson, who is more boring to watch?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Renofan, Dec 18, 2011.


  1. DOM5153

    DOM5153 They Cannot Run Forever Full Member

    12,340
    1
    Jan 9, 2009
    I actually enjoyed watching Ward last night, proved to everyone what a well rounded fighter he is.
     
  2. wassupjg

    wassupjg New Member Full Member

    28
    3
    Nov 14, 2010
    Liked watching Ward, he was slick, slippery, and in control - fluid performance
     
  3. Dbear

    Dbear Member Full Member

    236
    0
    Apr 19, 2011
    We all like to watch arturo gatti type fighters, but on a personal level I also like to watch your mayweathers and your wards etc. boxing is meant to be hit and not get hit and they have that style, I don't find it boring
     
  4. Reppin501

    Reppin501 The People's Champ Full Member

    21,962
    3,344
    Apr 26, 2010
    The butthurt readings are reaching dangerous levels!
     
  5. beefman180

    beefman180 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,858
    2
    May 16, 2011
    I don't find either boring frankly.

    When I think "boring" I think "John Ruiz".
     
  6. grutsch

    grutsch Member Full Member

    321
    32
    Oct 3, 2011
    I liked the last dawson fights... can t say ghe same about ward.
     
  7. fitzgeraldz

    fitzgeraldz And the new Full Member

    21,873
    3
    Feb 27, 2008
    I actually like boxers ... both are great to watch ...
     
  8. northpaw

    northpaw Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,489
    11,183
    Jun 5, 2010
    I'm a "BOXING" fan, like both fighters, although Dawson frustrates me
    far more than Ward does.
     
  9. slip&counter

    slip&counter Gimme some X's and O's Full Member

    24,813
    20
    Jul 23, 2008
    Neither is what i'd call boring. But Ward is MUCH better to watch.
     
  10. Count Pacula

    Count Pacula Cashweight Thrillionaire Full Member

    1,237
    0
    May 19, 2011
    I'd say Ward is more entertaining but they're both interesting to watch as long as they fight top guys. They can have boring fights depending on who they fight but they're not necessarily boring. The moment someone ignorant trashes Boxing and calls it, "human cockfighting" you brawler fans won't hesitate to bring up examples like Mayweather, Ward, and Hopkins. You'd be singing a different tune, making it sound like these guys are artists in the ring.
     
  11. mattress

    mattress Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,030
    2
    Apr 8, 2007
  12. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion

    124,201
    36,433
    Jun 23, 2005
    Neither are boring IMO both are quality boxers nothing boring about that.
     
  13. Daruf

    Daruf Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,127
    4
    Jan 7, 2006
    I think Dawson will be forgotten 2 days after he retires, hes the most invisible bland boxer i have experienced in a long time.
     
  14. SirKillalot

    SirKillalot Boxing-FAN Full Member

    502
    0
    Nov 8, 2009
    Did you not see his fight against Froch? Ward was pretty entertaining. Good counters, went to war(Well, kind of...and like Froch should have done...though he tried a little bit in the 11th and 12th round).
     
  15. Habecki

    Habecki Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,300
    0
    Dec 7, 2009
    Dawson more entertaining, when he actually lets his hands go he is one of the most exciting fighters out there. I swear if this guy steps it up mentally and takes boxing seriously he can become a mainstream star no problem.

    Ward is ok to watch, does a lot of good work but the problem is he has no power and not to blame him never gets hit!