Is there a further criteria of WBA Super Champ. I assumed it meant unified champ to keep the belt active. Has the WBA published a reason why there were 2 WBA SMW fights last night?
What makes you think they need a reason beyond 'because we want to'. Only two champions in a weight division is quite restrained for the WBA these days.
Yes, they can generate "Champions" at will, like "normal" Champion, "super" Champion, "interim" Champion, Champion "in recess", now they can install one more title Champion "in Headbutting" suits them well and Ward even better... What kind of "Champion" is Ward now anyway? Aside of the fact nobody told him it's a boxing fight not a headbutting fight last evening, what belt did he get now? "Normal" title it can't be since WBA "elevated" Kessler to "super" Champion prior to the fight and now Sartison is the "normal" Champion, so suppose Ward is "super" Champion now, what happens when Ward loses his next fight? Which title goes where? When Super Six is over one day, the winner was supposed to have both WBC and WBA belts, but as of today the WBA belt is with Sartison and the winner of the Super Six will be the WBC champion and WBA "don't know which crappy **** but it doesn't matter a damn anyway for it's that worthless IBO belt looks like made of pure gold in comparison" whatever it may be...
