Andre Ward vs Joe Calzaghe

yeah

you still trying to laugh off the argument that shows you to be wrong?

at least you are consistent.

 

Froch (although he's garbage) alone is better then any of Calzaghes wins. Of course, Joe's "win" against Hopkins doesnt count because Bernard actually won the fight but lost to the judges

Calzaghes best win is Kessler - who Ward beat even better. Dawson is also much better than anyone Calzaghe ever faced, and unlike Joe he legitimately beat Hopkins, something the bum couldn't do even though Hopkins was 43

Bika, Manfredo, Lacy etc are bums who never beat anyone notable. Kessler did nothing other than beat Froch. Joe is far from a top 100 p4p fighter and will always be a bum in the eye of boxing experts such as myself

The fact that you even question Ward's resume's superiority shows that you are a neophyte when it comes to boxing

 

He must have been doing pretty good because Bernard wanted to quit in the Calzaghe fight at least twice

 

Before round 12 - Joe's father "you HAVE to knock him out"

End of discussion. Look at Calzaghe's face before the decision. He knew he lost.

When you don't know what you're talking about, don't talk.

 

:good This

 

When did you start watching Boxing 2011?

Remember, The Lewis-Holyfield draw decision?

THEY DIDN'T WANT TO GET ROBBED!!!

 

No, they knew they lost. As does anyone who realizes that throwing 100 punches a round that do nothing don't win you a fight

 

Ward beat their one mutual opponent more decisively.

 

edge to Calzaghe, deep down he is more of a fighter and more experienced.

 

A semi-shot version, and with headbutts.:-(

 

Hopkins was looking for a way out. FACT!

 

A great American fighter will never beat a great European fighter.