Andre Ward vs Mike Mccallum

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Neebur, Jul 14, 2016.


  1. Neebur

    Neebur Active Member Full Member

    939
    316
    Jun 9, 2016
  2. 100wattwarlock

    100wattwarlock New Member Full Member

    54
    2
    Jan 23, 2015
    Draw, or 7-5 either way.
     
  3. Phil_Ivey_76

    Phil_Ivey_76 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,823
    175
    Aug 26, 2013
  4. lencoreastside

    lencoreastside Obsessed with Boxing banned Full Member

    20,213
    5,012
    Dec 27, 2010
    Not a fair or valid comparison - most of his career McCallum was a light middle - Mikes best days were at 154, and Ward is now a light heavy......
     
  5. turnip

    turnip Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,115
    39
    Oct 19, 2015
    Ward on points.kalambay stile.
     
  6. Gannicus

    Gannicus 2014 Poster of the Year Full Member

    13,452
    2,990
    Mar 4, 2014
    Ward. 168 version of McCallum was past it and way past his best weight.

    McCallum is one of the most underrated boxers in history. He's Top 50 in my ATG rankings.
     
  7. elmaldito

    elmaldito Skillz Full Member

    22,479
    6,251
    Jun 11, 2009
    160 and below mccallum kos ward
    168-175 ward ud
     
  8. Boxing fan 75

    Boxing fan 75 Active Member Full Member

    564
    9
    May 26, 2016
  9. N17

    N17 Loyal Member Full Member

    36,270
    33,086
    Feb 16, 2013
    If we are talking the very best McCallum then it's not that close, McCallum was and still is so underrated.

    Fighters like Halger gave McCallum a miss, personally I don't think it was out of fear but Hagler knew it would have been a very very difficult night.
     
  10. THE BLADE 2

    THE BLADE 2 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,716
    4,461
    Jul 14, 2009
    Mc Callum never fought at 168. He was at the end of his career at 175 pounds.

    So Ward wins at 175 pounds.