Just rewatched the fight as Ruiz is fighting this weekend. When I first watched it I thought Ruiz nicked it and was told I was insane. This was my card on rewatch: 1 - Ruiz 2 - Ruiz 3 - Ruiz 4 - Ruiz 5 - Miller 6 - Ruiz 7 - Ruiz (swing) 8 - Ruiz 9 - Miller 10 - Miller 11 - Ruiz 12 - Miller 116 - 112 Andy Ruiz A few notes on the scoring: - Walking forward and looking like an imposing unit doesn’t win you rounds. (You have to actually land punches.) And neither does shoe-shining in the last ten seconds. - Looking like an exhausted tub of lard doesn’t lose you rounds. Miller certainly had the better ‘optics’ in this fight but that is irrelevant to round by round scoring. - I honestly don’t see any case for Miller winning this or even getting a draw. The commentary was crazy: claiming Miller was winning a round just because he was the one walking forward, ignoring the body shots and inside counters Ruiz was landing throughout. People were right this was a robbery - but it was Ruiz who was (clearly) robbed! Go on then rip me apart.
I remember a controversial verdict. The first time I saw it, without looking at the scorecard, I had the impression that Miller deserved the verdict. Then I watched it again and I had a three point advantage over Miller, thus confirming my initial impressions.