Another Negative Assessment Of Horn's Tactics

brainless sheep then.. obviously just willing to follow a decision regardless of evidence proven otherwise.

 

It looks like its going to be lots..

Sorry to go off topic why do we get some many parrot threads here, not just on this issue but all the time..

Is the search function broken???

 

You mean angry crying?? or post fight analysis, shame judges can't wait a few days to make their decision, you know check out Twitter, Youtube etc so they can't make the correct decision.. Oh and ask you personally so you are happy..

 

Nah - those that whinge the most want there moment in the sun hence the creation of another thread.

Like those dickheads on Youtube that post up those "my reaction to..." clips - like we give a fark.

 

Opinion is not evidence.

 

opinion backed by strong evidence >> opinion of sheep
judges often stare a fair distance from where the fight is occuring in the ring. no monitor feed to them.
video evidence shows pac landing more, and jeff horn's "ineffectual" aggression.
also shows enough blatantly continous fouling that deserve point deductions on multiple counts, but even without that pac wins.

 

Its all irrelevant evidence tbh because its evidence the judges don't ever get. See they sit in the same spot and watch the fight live..

Whats to say if the camera shows the fight from different angles you wouldn't see it totally differently.

What if Pac didn't have so many angry crybois would every one of his losses be called a robbery?? Still going on about Bradley 1 how long ago was that?

What if your Aunty had balls would she be your Uncle???

 

Your talking rubbish but points for trying. Judges sit ringside dude - I am one of them.
Judges ruling>>opinion backed by cherry picking>>>opinion of sheep.

 

Yes of course the fighter who fouls is guilty of illegal offense and must shoulder the blame- usually done by being deducted a point or two or at worst disqualified eventually.

But when he is allowed to get away with all the known fouling tactics he used to spoil the fight, and the REF is failing in his care of duty for the one being fouled by allowing it to continue unabated for the whole of 12 rounds.....then he must also shoulder the blame for the final outcome.

 

look here my little donkeydik friend (just kidding) Horn fouled all the fight long did he not? and even if the judges saw it many times they can not just deduct a point on there own say so, which maybe would of had a big impact on the final outcome if the ref had of. I think Jeff won the fight, but he was allowed to foul his way to glory and denying that fact impacts on your credibility and legitimacy. I can not take you seriously if you can't accept the truth when it's talked about.

 

This content is protected

 

Jeff Horn is a punk
He will lose his title in his first defense

 

Judges view mean ZIP mean a camera and video replay can see more than you.

 

there you go, concession accepted. you agree judges cant see everything from their vantage point while a zooming view from various angles is more often telling of the story.