Joe, I can only deplore and not express enough disdain for your recent article in the Manchester Evening News titled Joe Gallagher: Amir Khan facing fight in battle of the box. http://menmedia.co.uk/manchestereve...r-amir-khan-facing-fight-in-battle-of-the-box Joe Gallagher's mentality reminds me of the stereotypical bureaucrat who cannot function unless he can "find it in the manual". Here's the story: Gallagher exhibits an overweening sense of entitlement and a predilection for depreciating others. Yes, I could add that his writings do not hold under close scrutiny, but I wanted to keep my message simple and direct. Gallagher needs to focus on John Murray and his other stable and stop trying to chase Khan. Its old, There is no " clear history between the two" the only clear history is that you have been calling out Khan for a long time and beat no one whatsoever of any note. Please beat someone of note like Katsidis or just go back to obscurity. Regards
Would you **** off you bellend? As Rob says, you can do this elsewhere without dragging the place down and make us seem (even more) like moaning twats to our posters inside the game.
Wasn't it HBO that turned down Murray? Bit rich of Gallagher to talk about turning down fights, though. Mr 'Why should we fight Ortiz? What about Juan Diaz?'
Do you remember Frank Maloney's comment that alot of these guys are insiders looking to stir up rumours and trouble? I know that every one on here talks ****, but these guy's who only have a few posts, and all of them attacking public figures? Do you reckon they are genuine people?
