Why do you slag Frampton when it comes to talk of Quigg, yet back him to win? Stop covering your arse you ponce.
You ALWAYS bring up how Frampton are ducking Quigg or you knock them constantly, yet you'd back Carl to do a number on Quigg. Why bother knocking them in the first place? Quigg, and you know this, is fighting nobodies. Face it.
Nobodies? A guy inside the top ten is a nobody? Who has Frampton fought? NO-ONE. Kiko was beaten TWICE by Munroe and Quigg beat Munroe. Why are you such a Frampton fan boy? I don't get it.
Love your triangle theory, but it's nonsense. Has Quigg beaten Kiko though? Thought not.. Fact is, is that Quigg hasn't beaten anyone worth a toss. You know this. If Quigg beat Kiko YOU would be all over it on here! Why do you knock Frampton if you think he beats Quigg?
Never has Frampton. Why do you get so upset about who Quigg faces when you don't even consider him a world champ?
He beat Kiko x2. That's better than any of Scott's wins. Because he is a utter fraud. Jesus, he makes Cleverly's run look like Ali's run in his pomp! Face it - Quigg isn't going to fight Kiko, Barry, Frampton, Rigo or LSC anytime soon (see the rest of his career). He is fighting nobodies.
No it isn't. Scott beat Munroe. Who beat Kiko TWICE. Why do we have to do this every time? Kiko is ****ing ****. He's a come forward plodder than any half-decent boxer would beat.
Triangle theory means nothing in combat sports. Styles makes fights. And what is Quigg? LOL! The man is a robotic, stiff-as-you-like 'Boxer' who only has a touch of power. He has ZERO SKILLS. Kiko would wallop Scott within 6 rounds. If that.