Answer me this haye fans....(On UK profits)

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by SomeGuy101, Jul 10, 2010.


Page 1 of 3
  1. SomeGuy101

    SomeGuy101 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,965
    0
    Oct 16, 2009
    Wow. Another day another direction in the Haye fan 'excuse' saga.


    After supporting haye's 'back pain' excuse.

    After backing the excuse of lying about the Klits demands.

    After backing Hayes' 'Slave Contract' demand only to Support Haye taking another slave contract (versus Valuev) - there's an oxymoron! (Yes, that's actually a word btw not an insult)

    After saying it was because of the birth of his new child Haye didn't want to fight

    After sayign haye should have 50/50 and after backing Booth and Bunce who said Wlad didn't offer 50/50.

    Then after Booth turned around later and said 50/50 was offered, with no rematch clauses, but they wanted the Klits on a different German channel Haye fans backed this 'new' statement as 100% truth (again) while forgetting the precious 50/50 'lie' was ever told and Justifying this new excuse




    Now Haye fans are saying if the fight is 50/50 100% down the middle it's unfair because "David Haye makes more money in the UK" so should get the UK revenue

    Well answer me this everyone:

    This content is protected
     
    SomeGuy101, Jul 10, 2010
    SomeGuy101, Jul 10, 2010
    #1
  2. MagicMan91

    MagicMan91 The Main Event Mafia Full Member

    9,950
    1
    Dec 26, 2009
    *Tumbleweed and silence*
     
    MagicMan91, Jul 10, 2010
    MagicMan91, Jul 10, 2010
    #2
  3. Escopeta

    Escopeta Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,131
    8
    Apr 12, 2010
    50-50 offer was a lie and Haye as well as Booth had to sign a contract to keep silent about the negotiations or the Klits will never fight him.
    The Klits forced Booth to back up the 50-50 lie offer due to the slave contract or the russian mafia will murder them and their families.
    Wlad ducks Haye
    the Klits just do a coward show on yanks fake moon landing level.
    Haye wants them so badly but they cheat him since they know Haye is a great draw due to his greatness and exciting style. Klit nuthuggers always come up with the ridiculous claim that the brothers are biggest draws in todays boxing aside from floyd an pacman but they dont even sell ppv´s. They want to make it look like that Haye wants to cash them up at the gate, sponsoring etc all what the Klits draw and just dont want to share his UK-gains.
    But thats another lie
    Haye was even willing to fight Wlad basically for free if only that back injury hadnt occured.

    Has Wlad even earned a shot at Haye?
    Haye should move on and fight Audley.
     
    Escopeta, Jul 10, 2010
    Escopeta, Jul 10, 2010
    #3
  4. robpalmer135

    robpalmer135 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,342
    0
    Jun 29, 2007
    look. i have been a haye fan for a long time. he should of accepted K2's 50-50 offer. But Hayes offer to Wlad was also perfectly reasonable. There both as bad as each other.
     
    robpalmer135, Jul 10, 2010
    robpalmer135, Jul 10, 2010
    #4
  5. hussleman

    hussleman Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,976
    18
    Jun 14, 2006
    I think if Wlad was intrested in fighting HAYE HE SHOULD HAVE WAITED A FEW WEEKS FOR HAYE'S BACK TO HEAL BEFORE HE CANCELLED THE FIGHT.
     
    hussleman, Jul 10, 2010
    hussleman, Jul 10, 2010
    #5
  6. REEVO

    REEVO Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,142
    2
    Mar 16, 2009
    :good This is true, Frank Warren says he should take a 50 . 50 cut he wont do better than that..
     
    REEVO, Jul 10, 2010
    REEVO, Jul 10, 2010
    #6
  7. GazOC

    GazOC Guest Star for Team Taff Full Member

    61,460
    38
    Jan 7, 2005
    There was **** all wrong with Hayes back, the money for his purse fell though when Setanta went tits up.
     
    GazOC, Jul 10, 2010
    GazOC, Jul 10, 2010
    #7
  8. rushman

    rushman Devoid is Devoid Full Member

    7,308
    1
    Jul 24, 2004
    You think Wlad should accept less than 50%?
     
    rushman, Jul 10, 2010
    rushman, Jul 10, 2010
    #8
  9. robpalmer135

    robpalmer135 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,342
    0
    Jun 29, 2007
    not true. klitsckos said they would take him to court if he didnt provide medical evidence. theres been no court case. if K2 truly believe he was lying they wouldnt of entered negotiations with Haye again.
     
    robpalmer135, Jul 10, 2010
    robpalmer135, Jul 10, 2010
    #9
  10. Escopeta

    Escopeta Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,131
    8
    Apr 12, 2010
    They should offer at least 75-25 in favor of Haye or they basically duck him
     
    Escopeta, Jul 10, 2010
    Escopeta, Jul 10, 2010
    #10
  11. REEVO

    REEVO Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,142
    2
    Mar 16, 2009
    Definatley not probably 55 -45 he should get the bulk...
     
    REEVO, Jul 10, 2010
    REEVO, Jul 10, 2010
    #11
  12. REEVO

    REEVO Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,142
    2
    Mar 16, 2009
    :nut :nut :nut WTF
     
    REEVO, Jul 10, 2010
    REEVO, Jul 10, 2010
    #12
  13. robpalmer135

    robpalmer135 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,342
    0
    Jun 29, 2007
    I dont give a **** what either one gets paid.

    If Wladamir Klitscko wanted to fight Haye for any reason other than money, he would off accepted the deal.

    If Haye wanted to fight Wlad for any reason other than money, he would off accepted the deal.
     
    robpalmer135, Jul 10, 2010
    robpalmer135, Jul 10, 2010
    #13
  14. rushman

    rushman Devoid is Devoid Full Member

    7,308
    1
    Jul 24, 2004
    So Wlad should, in theory, fight for free? What a fascinating idea.

    :patsch
     
    rushman, Jul 10, 2010
    rushman, Jul 10, 2010
    #14
  15. robpalmer135

    robpalmer135 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,342
    0
    Jun 29, 2007
    where did i say that. with either deal both are clearing $15million of Wlad really wanted Haye that bad he would give up $2million to Haye.
     
    robpalmer135, Jul 10, 2010
    robpalmer135, Jul 10, 2010
    #15
Page 1 of 3