Lol no but it's true he never hit the deck though he was hurt more than once by Usyk. Fury's tendency to switch off during fights has seen him dropped so many times during his career, he can go from being in control to being flat on his back faster than Andy Ruiz can clean his plate, lol.
He was hurt, but never really hurt or in danger of going down. Also you also forget that this was 34 years old Usyk, who was miles better than this one. In the rematch Usyk was 35. This is 37.5 years old way past his best years. Not a comparison. So yeah, taking all of this, AJ definitely did better, and Fury should have been stopped, even Fury best friend Chisora says that he should have been stopped and that this was the slowest count in the history. This content is protected
The AJ fanboys are out of hiding. Just because Usyk beat Fury, they are behaving like AJ beat Fury. That fight has not happened yet.
In their first fight, Joshua put up a lazy, dull, uninspiring performance against Usyk. In the second he performed better, although Usyk was clearly the winner that night. Fury made Usyk wobble on more than one occasion. Sure, he was decked and may have even been stopped if not for assistance from the referee and the bell. But he still put up a better fight against the Ukranian. Fury did better against Usyk than Joshua, considering all three fights.
Usyk - Fury is irrelevant to AJ - Fury. But Fury - Ngannou is very relevant what AJ will do to Fury. Also Fury is the one that is ducking the fight, otherwise we would have already known who would win.
