Anthony Joshua or Frank Bruno

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by u oryt m8, Sep 17, 2025 at 2:33 AM.


Who would've won?

  1. Joshua

  2. Bruno

Results are only viewable after voting.
  1. u oryt m8

    u oryt m8 New Member Full Member

    36
    36
    Monday
    I see it differently. Time allows people to make Bruno out to be better than he actually was. It's easy to sell it because people haven't got the time or motivation to sit and go through a bulk of his career.
     
    boxberry92 likes this.
  2. boxberry92

    boxberry92 Active Member Full Member

    878
    1,256
    Jun 22, 2008
    As Bobby said, it’s your prerogative.

    Personally, I think if Fury doesn’t disappear for three years after Klitschko, Joshua never wins a title. And to put Bruno in perspective, I don’t think Fury would have fared as well in the era of Holmes, Tyson, Lewis, Holyfield, and Bowe as he has in the era of Wilder, Chisora, Whyte, and… Ngannou.
     
    Noel857 and Beale like this.