Anthony Joshua puts Deontay Wilder to shame!

The only way to settle this is Joshua Vs Wilder, Summer 2017 at Wembley Stadium.

I'll be there, singing our boring British national anthem.

On a side note, we need to change our national anthem to something more lively. I love the British people and my country but a very large group of drunk people singing "Goooooood saaaaave our gracious Queeeen" must sound to the outside world like we are all on dribble pills and just droning.


I'd like to hear some suggestions, serious ones, what would get us British going?

 

Sweet. So if Wlad wins you'll give him a hat tip?

 

Britain needs to Heavy Metallize their anthem. There's no other way

Seriously, though, you're kinda stuffed there. The countries with the lively carnival-theme anthems are nearly all Latin countries with a revolutionary background. All the "we are the Empire" type countries have these grand, sad type anthems.

Or, here's a thought, you could go full Commie. The old USSR had an anthem that stirs the neck hairs. Change the way you sing it.

 

"Go full commie"

Yeah I like that idea, we need to metallise it, change the tempo and growl the words.

 

Says the guy that wrote an essay breaking down why Charles Martin would KO Joshua in 3.

Truly laughable.

 

Holy Palindromicular Postcount Batman!

 

The bookmakers had Martin a huge underdog to beat Joshua, whereas they slightly favor Joshua to beat Wlad.

There is nothing outlandish about picking AJ to win against Wlad. Picking Martin to KO Joshua in 3 on the other hand...

 

It's the embarrassing defending of Wilder that's most puzzling. I don't know how you can condemn Joshua as a can crushing fraud whilst simultaneously trying to defend the great can crusher of our time Deontay Wilder. AJ has had 20 less fights than him in a pro career far half as long and he's the fraud apparently. A fraud who brutally dispatched a man he picked to beat him to win his title. Him trying to pump up shot to pieces Arreola as an opponent shows how far removed from reality he is when it comes to both Joshua and Wilder.

I'm also pretty amused by Dino's quite frankly pathetic attempt to draw distinctions between Wilder's resume and Joshua's. A lot to this seems to revolve around trying to discredit Breazeale, a guy nobody particularly rated with a somewhat padded record. Hughie was ill when he beat Kassi easily apparently. OK, so why didn't he include the fact that Stiverne was ill with rhabdomyolysis when Wilder beat him? His agenda driven nonsense is tragic.

It'd be interesting to see how bookmakers would price fights between Whyte and Duhaupas - who's best win is over a crippled, shot to ****, overhyped Helenius - Martin and Szpilka and Breazeale against current Arreola. I don't think there'd be a lot in it.

The fact is AJ has done a similar amount to Wilder in a far shorter period of time. He also appears quite likely to to **** all over Deontay's resume with his next fight.

 

Its you. You fail to give Wilder credit on any level so posters are comparing Joshua and Wilder and are letting you know that your dissing of Wilder is fraudish, fake, and unwarranted.

 

Cashing out at this point in his career? Ridiculous.

 

If anyone slates both I'm cool with it. I just don't see how you can take the one looking like he actually wants to do something in comparison to the other and bury that guy whilst defending the other. It makes no sense.

And I haven't said Wilder is bad, simply that's he's reluctant. As I've said before we don't know if he's the real deal because he won't step up. The same could of been said about Joshua - although he's a newer belt holder and been pro for a much shorter time - but he looks to be about to step up.

Dino's excuse about Wilder's lack of amatuer experience is also pretty funny. The guy's an Olympic bronze medalist.

 

Work on your reading comprehension dumbass, I said MORE OR LESS ON PAR - and that Wilder has a SLIGHT advantage resume wise due to having twice as many fights and more defenses. I never once said that Joshuas wins were better. But comparing them individually to Wilders best wins there's not much between them

Stiverne is garbage. As evidenced by his being dropped by and life and death struggle with Journeyman Rossy, outboxed over 10 rounds by a shot 40+ Ray Austin before rallying, stopped by journeyman King. Other than Arreola he's beaten no one, and Arreola hasn't looked so hot lately himself. He was lucky to capitalize on the vacuum Vitali Klitschko left in the division as well as poor decisions made by the WBC.

It was known to anyone with an ounce of common sense that Helenius is shot to bits these days, we've been saying it for years. Powers gone and that was the x-factor that made him relevant, without that he's just an average tall rangy Euro-level type. Which is exactly the reason he was only a slight favorite over Duhaupas - who in his own right while solid is operating at a European-Fringe world level. If he has anything over Martin, Whyte and Breazeale it's not a whole lot. Same applies to Szpilka and Molina - Fringe world types but not world beaters.

 

No , you just don't get it do you?

The guys Wilder beat are better than the guys Joshua beat. It has nothing to do whatsoever about the bums Wilder beat 5 years ago.
Scott is better than Brazzelle. Stiverne is better than Martin. And not 'more or less better' .. A LOT better. Its about the qulity of the guys beat , not the amount of them.