Well Bruno was and won a world title, Joshua is better than Bruno and could probably beat some of the top guys in the lower half of the top 10. The fact is Bowe avoided all the notable punchers in 90s and probably wouldn't face Joshua in reality.
Who says AJ is better than Bruno? Bruno hurt a prime Tyson, was up on points against a young Lewis, and never got steam rolled by any fighter as terrible as Ruiz. What makes AJ any better than Bruno? Besides hype?
Riddick would have him in absolute Hell. Probably stop in fairly early. Better jab, tougher, better chin, more durable, better on the inside. I see no scenario that leads to Joshua even being competitive.
Who says Joshua is better than Bruno ? He has better skill set for one, better punch variety, and is overall better fighter who achieved more than Bruno. As for Ruiz I would say he had a good chance of beating Bruno, and it's not like Bruno is beating Usyk either is it.
He was battered by a walking cheeseburger, and y'all are tossing him in there with Big Daddy? Yikes. I don't see it going well for AJ if we're sending in any decent version of Bowe.
AJ has a better chin than Golota. Prime Bowe would mess AJ up but the Bowe that fought Golota would get battered and end up even more brain damaged. AJ was overrated but he's better than 90s guys like Golota.
I would have to go with Bowe, and if Joshua Smacked him on the back of the head like he did Franklin, Bowe would go all Elijah Tillery on him!!
AJ's one of these guys that just didn't improve. May will argue he may have even devolved. The safe bet is Bowe for me against any Joshua.