Anthony Joshua vs the following

Fighters who carry around artificial amounts of muscle mass dont tend to fair well as they hit their 30s and especially once they hit 33-34. Great recent example is David Haye.

AJ is 29 now and arguably in the final year of his peak.

Injuries and stamina issues as well as that extra bounce of youth will lead to some surprising losses if he keeps being matched at a high level and fighting on until 35.

Then we will have a better base view of him.

 

loses to vitaly

1999 holyfield second hardest.

mercer,mcCall,tua have chance..

 

LL The Lion's and he would ko the present AJ ,imo.

 

No way.

 

McCall couldn`t even stop Bruno who was nowhere near AJ`s level, Tua was a poor man`s Povetkin with a bigger punch, he was extremely limited.

 

Haye wasn`t a natural heavyweight like AJ is and was awful against Wlad.

 

I actually think Mercer could beat him,considering how he did against Lewis.

Heavyweight is not my best division to talk about, though

 

Did you see how small AJ was in the amateurs mate?

Look at the pictures. AJ is carrying a lot additional muscle above his natural frame type.

 

Lewis was awful against Mercer, he had no skill in that fight at all, AJ would have matched Mercder`s jab and hit him with better combo`s, Lewis improved by the time he met Holy.

 

He`s 6'5.5-6'6 and Haye was knocked out by a cruiser.

 

You are without a doubt the village idiot on the forum.......

AJ was put on his azz by a shot gun shy glass chinned Grandpa , a fighter who was in his prime leveled by absolute ham and eggers......let that sink in for a minute.......the current heavyweight scene is garbage including the top three guys.

 

Frame and height are two different things

Here are pictures of AJ as an amateur- his natural frame is far smaller than the puffed up man he is today.

https://www.times-series.co.uk/news...boys-former-coach-on-anthony-joshua/#gallery0

That muscle mass catches up with you, as do the natural consequences of being 30, 31, 32 +