The poster who asked the question doesn't even think Wallin is a top 10 heavyweight. Ngannou was ranked in the top 10. Jake Paul got a top 10 ranking at cruiserweight. JAKE PAUL. Why are you doing this If any world class rankings aren't justified they're unreliable and anyone using those rankings can go to hell
He said top 10 opponent meaning who was ranked in the top 10. Again what's so hard to understand about it ? I don't really care about your irrational/trolling the facts are Wallin was a top 10 ranked opponent end of. Anything else you say is irrelevant or opinion based.
So based on your own logic you must also think Ngannou was a top 10 heavyweight boxer in the world right ? https://www.espn.com/boxing/story/_...mp-francis-ngannou-ranked-wbc-tyson-fury-loss https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.sk...g-following-knockout-defeat-to-anthony-joshua Are you also gullible enough to believe Jake Paul is a real top 15 cruiserweight and deserving of a title shot ? https://www.espn.com/boxing/story/_...-ranked-eligible-wba-cruiserweight-title-shot Good to see where you stand. Don't @ me again
You're getting so emotional because your so fixated on your hate for Joshua you seem to forget the premise of the thread. Yet again I'll explain it for a 3rd time. OP asked who was the last top 10. The answer is Wallin. You're debating on whether he was legitimately top 10 and going off topic about Paul or Ngannou that's irrelevant the fact is Wallin was top 10 and that's the answer to the OPs question. As for "don't @ you" Maybe take a deep breath before replying and remember what the premise of the actual question was.
Good to see you can't see a difference between a fighter being ranked by one sanctioning body and a fighter being ranked by 3 sanctioning bodies and every independent outlet. Hate can be one hell of a drug.
He did nothing to deserve the ranking and got beat up by an old gatekeeper. Wallin wouldn't beat any legitimate top 10 heavyweight during this era, because he never has There are 4, not 3. Wallin was never ranked by all 4 sanctioned bodies (belts) and there were more than 10 heavyweights who had a better argument in 2023. Fury, Joshua, Zhang, Hrgovic, Wilder, Parker, Sanchez, Ajagba, Joyce, Dubois, even Kabayel already scored a win over Makhmudov on that same card and Makhmudov was ranked higher than Gassiev using your own logic. Wallin high rankings has no substance and shouldn't be seen as of any significance
Who had Dubois beat to be in your rankings before December 2023 after he just quit against Usyk? Trevor Bryan? Lol. Who had Sanchez beat? Ajagba 2 years back? Who had Ajagba beat? Who did Phil Jackson beat to be a Top 10 guy when Lewis faced him?
Dubois beat Miller on that same card, did you purposely leave that out ? Miller > past it Gassiev. Ajagba > past it Gassiev. Gassiev best win at heavyweight is Kem Ljungquist. On paper that is not better than beating Shaw, Kossobutski, and Goodall, 3 prospects, 2 of them undefeated. Hunter had a draw with Povetkin and a win over Bakole, he still should've been ranked above Wallin despite his decline and inactivity. Otto was never a world class heavyweight lol, you're the one playing mental gymnastics, you haven't even given me a good name on his record
If you see an idiot down the street, you just crossed paths with an idiot. If you see idiots all the time, YOU are the idiot.
You think Wallin is a top 10 heavyweight in the world when he got blown away by a shot Chisora. I also caught you claiming old Chisora would beat prime Tony Tubbs. i'm not the idiot here