It doesn't change anything pertaining to the thread subject,Joshua would beat almost all on my list,thats my opinion based on his skills size and power along with what I think I know is talent.
Fighters are not all time greats head to head, without it having some impact on their record. If your list was literally correct, we would be seeing some sort of results to support it.
ATG's are a lable again nothing to do with actual head to head match ups. the results would be common sense really,my list is pretty solid no matter where you rank them.
You seem to be saying that a fighter being good head to head, has nothing to do with them proving themself to be good head to head. If the results of fights are common sense, then you don't need to work for a living!
You sound like some kind of freak tbh.... and I cant say you know much about anything really when faced with possible real time discussions.
Now you've changed your mind again. I'll repeat, if he was to lose his next 30 fights you wouldn't be saying that.
I think its pretty clear he wouldn't be considered on my list if he were retired and lost many fights would he? had that happened. Its really not hard of a thread is it?
I am sorry that you feel that way. I think that you still have more to learn from the other people on this site, than they have to learn from you.
I didn't change anything though?lol I am putting Joshua up there based on the NOW,nothing hidden or hard about why when im looking at other things if he were to fight other era fighters.
Well possibly but you wouldn't be one beleive me,you are like a smarter Dino Velvet who ive encountered on here which isn't going far.