Anthony Oluwafemi Joshua vs. Joseph Dennis Parker - the standalone IB RBR scorecard.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by IntentionalButt, Apr 1, 2018.


  1. JeremyCorbyn

    JeremyCorbyn Active Member Full Member

    742
    776
    Jul 15, 2017
    I'm gonna have to eat a little bit of humble pie here.

    On the night, I was watching the fight on Sky Box Office, and I thought Joshua won easily, like 10-2 maybe 9-3, and didn't know what people were going on about saying it was close.

    I've just rewatched it, with the showtime commentary this time, and it was almost like I was watching a different fight, especially those early rounds 2-4, which I originally had Joshua winning comfortably. Now I'm not so sure.

    I think I'm gonna watch it a third time with the commentary off.

    Well either way, I think it was closer than I originally thought, or at the very least I can see why people are scoring it close. So I apologise for thinking some of you were absolutely deluded. :D
     
  2. CST80

    CST80 De Omnibus Dubitandum Staff Member

    239,062
    230,445
    Nov 23, 2013
    Rumsfeld likes this.
  3. FrankinDallas

    FrankinDallas FRANKINAUSTIN

    28,229
    34,500
    Jul 24, 2004
    How did Putin score it it, Pinko?
     
  4. TheyDontBoxNoMore7

    TheyDontBoxNoMore7 Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    3,432
    2,406
    Nov 2, 2016
    Rd 1: AJ 10-9

    Rd 2: AJ 20-18

    Rd 3: AJ 30-27

    Rd 4: AJ 40-36

    Rd 5: AJ 50-45
    Joshua landed a solid left hook and a few hard jabs. Parker was given credit for a missed right hand. Other than flashy work, he was not effective. Even while he chased AJ across the ring at a brief period of the round.

    Rd 6: AJ 60-54
    Parker is once again getting credit for ineffective work. Another chase sequence where AJ goes backward and makes it look like Parker is doing more but upon review, AJ still lands the better punches like a counter right sweep over Parker’s left hook before intervention from the ref. Parker’s best shot was a right hook/uppercut under AJ’s right armpit. AJ landed 2 nice right hands and a few clean jabs throughout the round. Also a couple of nice body shots. Left hook-right hook combination.

    Rd 7: Parker 64-69
    Parker’s body work and fighting out of the clinch gave him the slight razor thin edge in this round. AJ’s jab peppered throughout this round was almost just as effective.

    Rd 8: AJ 78-74
    AJ’s most dominant round thus far. Lands good left hooks throughout the round. Lands nice solid jabs. Parker literally did nothing this round. AJ gets credit for a missed right uppercut that did not land by observers. This was the clearest round up to this point. Very one sided.

    Rd 9: AJ 88-73
    Shitty round for both. AJ at least landed clean jabs throughout.

    Rd 10: AJ 98-82
    Pretty self explanatory round. AJ finally lands a clean right uppercut for once. Nice right hand, left hook-right elbow combination opens cut on Parker’s left eye. Parker did land some body shots. AJ pays them no mind.

    Rd 11: AJ 108-91
    AJ getting the better of Parker.

    Rd 12: AJ- 118-110

    Anyone having this a draw or Parker winning. Go to an eye doctor ASAP and have someone take you because you’re clinically blind.
     
    KingFury64 likes this.
  5. Somachenko

    Somachenko The Matador Team Full Member

    3,956
    4,557
    Jan 6, 2018
    Anyone who has it 118-110 is a Matchroom and Sky shill IMO. It wasn’t a pretty fight, and the weirdly wide scorecards plus Joshua demanding Wilder come to the UK **** the division up for a while in my opinion. No one who takes their career seriously would be willing to go over and fight Anthony when they know they never had a chance on the cards. I rewatched it and had it 8-4 Joshua but initially said it could’ve been any range from 8-4 Joshua to 8-4 Parker and stick with that.
     
    PIRA and CST80 like this.
  6. lobk

    lobk Original ESB Member Full Member

    28,368
    17,654
    Jul 19, 2004
    If you have AJ winning 11 rnds the final score is 119-109 not 118-110. Blind scoring from a blind fan!
     
    chitownfightfan and PIRA like this.
  7. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    396,368
    78,641
    Nov 30, 2006
    AJ sweeping the first half? :jaja-no:
     
    chitownfightfan, CST80 and Somachenko like this.
  8. uppercut_to_the_body

    uppercut_to_the_body Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,808
    2,384
    Sep 19, 2017
    :lol:
     
    CST80 likes this.
  9. CST80

    CST80 De Omnibus Dubitandum Staff Member

    239,062
    230,445
    Nov 23, 2013
    :risas3: I gotta say, that's an awesome April Fools TDBNM.



    Oh wait....:confused:
     
  10. Guybino

    Guybino Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,584
    1,691
    Mar 6, 2011
    I am one of them,

    fair play, defensively he looked alot more sound than before.
     
  11. TheyDontBoxNoMore7

    TheyDontBoxNoMore7 Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    3,432
    2,406
    Nov 2, 2016
    I’m good bro. I’m no longer responding to stupid. How about you do boxing forum 24 proud and write an article how Parker was robbed. Have IB back you with his draw.
     
  12. N17

    N17 Loyal Member Full Member

    36,270
    33,084
    Feb 16, 2013
    Live I scored it 116-112 Joshua, there was drinking, there were text messages and my wife wouldn't stop talking at me, I was very distracted.

    Watching it again today, completely sober and wife out I scored it 115-113 Joshua.

    Some of the rounds I thought were very close, so I am not surprised at varied scores, also not much happened in a few rounds, lots of missing and the referee was an absolute joke, the referee looked genuinely worried that a fight would break out.

    I would never tell anybody how to score, I'm not great and don't pretend to be, there are far better scorers on here, they nail it time after time and I genuinely respect their knowledge and opinions.

    But what I have heard today from people I know who are not really boxing fans is they scored it wide for AJ (or perceived it to be rather one sided) simply because AJ was coming forward, they seemed to miss a lot of action, the subtle stuff because they fell in to a thought pattern of "coming forward is winning" so just scored every round that way and also scored them to AJ because he was "trying to make the fight".

    I also believe the commentary influenced some of these people, the Joshua "love in" was on overdrive last night, it always is.

    I'm starting to sound like Pacquiao fans and the old "play it in slow motion" LOL but I do believe the crowd noise even coming through the TV, Joshua fans in your earhole and the ridiculous Sky commentary really can influence some people.

    Anyway in the UK at least, I personally blame the likes of Sky Sports Boxing for the lack boxing knowledge in a lot of these people who are tuning in because they talk utter rubbish most of the time, they dumb it down, blatantly lie and are completely agenda driven and there is a generation of boxing fans coming through that are not being given the tools to score fights or encouraged think for themselves..

    Because If Adam Smith says it with enough passion and Carl Froch repeats it, then post fight Johnny Nelson confirms it and Bellew in his accent and cheeky manner confirms what Johnny Nelson just said then it must be correct.
     
  13. drenlou

    drenlou VIP Member Full Member

    74,190
    38,398
    Jan 22, 2015
    I had parker winning 7-5.
     
    lobk and CST80 like this.
  14. PIRA

    PIRA Arise Sir Lennox. Full Member

    5,426
    882
    Mar 30, 2007
    :ohno
     
    CST80 likes this.
  15. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    396,368
    78,641
    Nov 30, 2006
    1. You can't expect to be taken seriously when you have NO COMMENT WHATSOEVER on the close first third of the fight, which pretty much nobody else on the planet had a clean 4-0 sweep to Joshua. You can't just brush that under the rug and say "yep, nothing to see here, four clear Joshua rounds in a row, obviously..." and not substantiate that with anything when you're clearly willing and ready to provide more detailed analysis of the next several rounds. :lol:
    2. You deserve credit for giving Parker the 7th (even though it appears to be the ONLY round you gave him, and was much closer IMO than some of his very clear early rounds that you didn't give him); many inexperienced scorers would here be swayed (and were, on some cards that I've seen) by a couple of Joshua's big punches into not doing so.
    3. You had it 69-64 Joshua entering the 8th, then claim it was Joshua's most dominant round but somehow tabulate an updated score of 78-74 Joshua, as though you gave it to Parker (69+9=78, 64+10=74), so your real score is 119-109.