Yep...he didn't punch any harder...just didn't have the same effect...! Hold those nuts tight ELChillon...! LOL...!
Dude we're talking about scientists here, forensic types, they are not going cross the bridge of assumption now matter how close it is. "Plaster like" is the best you're gonna get from them when it ws not actually yet plaster. And I didn't come up with that, that was the conclusion they came to, the conclusion anyone would come to after knowing the scientific fact that every ingredient for Plaster of Paris was found except water. The next question is going to be why would a boxer have that on his wraps, how would it get there? It would not take long to realize it could only have been put there on purpose, then the question would be answered once it's realized how the water could be attained. All dots would then be connected, the guy is obviously a guilty cheater. This puzzle is a very simple one.
I did on my old computer, it crashed. I don't feel like looking for it, you just go ahead and believe whatever you want to. Disregard all commonsense and don't let anyone shake up your carefully crafted world. Margarito was banned for nothing, branded a cheater, and opted not to sue, feel better?
Yea I'll continue to believe the facts. I posted a link to the ruling against Margarito and it never mentioned anything about ingredients of plaster. It only mentioned a plaster like substance which doesn't mean it was plaster. If what you say is correct, then it was plaster and the report should have referred to what was in Margarito's pads as plaster and not "plaster like"
Your just being willfully ignorant like the rest of them, it doesn't matter what I say or post or anyone else you will believe what you want to. Here is a quote for you to ignore.. A Department of Justice senior criminalist who inspected the wrappings under stereomicroscope and X-ray flourescence spectrometer reported calcium and sulfur were discovered, noting the elements make plaster of Paris with the addition of oxygen. It comes from here.. http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/sports_blog/2009/03/margarito-wraps.html Take special note of "senior criminalist" and the fact it is missing (which is why they can't yet call it plaster) only one ingredient that would be provided by water.
http://www.dca.ca.gov/csac/meetings/agendas/20100818.pdf ^^^There's quite a bit of info here. There can be no doubt. Some of the quotes from the inspectors on the scene.... License inspector Mike Bray was called to testify and to reiterate what was found on the hand wrapswhich he said looked moist and dirty looking. ....... I immediately retrieved it. I believe it was an illegal padit needed to be confiscated. I observed what appeared to be a bloodstain. It was not new and their was a white substance smeared across the knuckles. It was hard to the touchlike Plaster of Paris.- Mike Bray, License Inspector CSAC inspector David Pereda, who was in the room, later testified, Naazim opened the gauze and pulled something out of it. He showed us what appeared to be an old gauze which had been used before and hardened from perhaps being sweaty and wet many times. Inspector Guevara testified, It [the knuckle pad] was a clean new bandage. But within it, in the inner layers of it, was another bandage wrap. It was not as white as a new bandage wrap would be. It was used and it looked almost like it was sweat soaked and thats what caused it to have the discoloration. It was harder in certain areas than it should be for pure gauze. It was definitely firm and hard. I believe there was a little bit of, it looked like old blood, on it. No doubt then, no doubt now. The wraps I found had the knuckle pad altered in some form. They were hard. I didnt think twice when I pulled them out as illegal. - Dean Lohuis, Chief Inspector